Hank
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Hank
Definitely not a winger.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5598
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Hank
If he was kicking last nite i would have understood his selection
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
-
- Posts: 4188
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Hank
Would make more sense to me to play Sarginson on the wing and Hank at Centre...Firestarter wrote: ↑Fri Jul 19, 2019 11:40 am If he was kicking last nite i would have understood his selection
If Lam thinks Sarginson is our backup Fullback then his ability to catch under the high ball and field kicks isnt an obvious issue... Strange one to me.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Hank
Does it matter Ffs?
Wigan won,they all had a go on the wing,I was praying to see clubb have a spell out there but it was to be.
Wigan won,they all had a go on the wing,I was praying to see clubb have a spell out there but it was to be.
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Hank
That’s true but he has no pace and Wakefield exploited that with their kicking game.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
-
- Posts: 125
- Joined: Sun Aug 16, 2015 4:14 pm
Re: Hank
Hank is a solid back up and can play in the backs and forwards, If you notice all our wingers defend 5 yards in from the touchline, especially Burgess who got caught out by Huddersfield and St Helens on more than one occasion.