Cas v WIGAN
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Its a joke, wakefield had handling issues so they did something about it, we dont.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Anyone else multitasking by watching the Hull derby whilst listening to Wigan? To be fair, the derby looks a much better contest. At least it sounds like Smith is putting a few good kicks.
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Whos going to create the Lam out thread first 
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
-
ancientnloyal
- Posts: 14381
- Joined: Tue Apr 11, 2006 10:33 pm
- Location: Howe Bridge
- Contact:
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Or continue an old Lam Out thread...
https://www.ancientandloyal.com/
James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
James Slevin
Ces Mountford
And the “kind of rugby player you’d want to be in your dreams” James Leytham
Should be in the Wigan Warriors Hall
Of Fame
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Penalty penalty penalty. That’s all your really hearing on the radio.
Lam says he will bring more flair. My arse!!
Lam says he will bring more flair. My arse!!
Re: Cas v WIGAN
So boring if this is the attacking play we were promised from Lam bring back Wane
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Struggling to understand our squad today. Byrne and Havard are good players but why are we not playing Bullock and Clark\Greenwood. Cas have a few out, surely we should be playing some more experienced players.
Re: Cas v WIGAN
Wane out
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Cas v WIGAN
So will anybody ask Farrel what the game plan was
-
Wintergreen
- Posts: 1620
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm