Disciplinary Round 9

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
josie andrews
Posts: 35575
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Disciplinary Round 9

Post by josie andrews »

Following the round 9 games in the Betfred Super League, the below charges have been issued by the RFL's Match Review Panel;

Luke Gale (Leeds Rhinos)
Grade A Dangerous throw - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Tomkins (Catalans Dragons)
Grade A Trip - 1 Match Penalty Notice

Reece Lyne (Wakefield Trinity)
Grade C Dangerous Contact - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Moa (Catalans Dragons)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Tommy Makinson (St Helens)
Grade F Other Contrary Behaviour - Refer to Tribunal

Grant Millington (Castleford Tigers)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Grade A Dangerous Contact - 1 Match Penalty Notice (should the above charge be accepted

Matt Lees (St Helens)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Ben Murdoch-Masila (Warrington Wolves)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Blake Austin (Warrington Wolves)
Grade A Trip - 0 Match Penalty Notice

https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/1 ... ry-round-9
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
josie andrews
Posts: 35575
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by josie andrews »

josie andrews wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:43 pm Following the round 9 games in the Betfred Super League, the below charges have been issued by the RFL's Match Review Panel;

Luke Gale (Leeds Rhinos)
Grade A Dangerous throw - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Tomkins (Catalans Dragons)
Grade A Trip - 1 Match Penalty Notice


Reece Lyne (Wakefield Trinity)
Grade C Dangerous Contact - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Moa (Catalans Dragons)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Tommy Makinson (St Helens)
Grade F Other Contrary Behaviour - Refer to Tribunal

Grant Millington (Castleford Tigers)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Grade A Dangerous Contact - 1 Match Penalty Notice (should the above charge be accepted

Matt Lees (St Helens)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Ben Murdoch-Masila (Warrington Wolves)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Blake Austin (Warrington Wolves)
Grade A Trip - 0 Match Penalty Notice


https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/1 ... ry-round-9
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
User avatar
Mike
Site Admin
Posts: 7403
Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2018 6:54 pm
Contact:

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by Mike »

Austin's trip was such an obvious one as well. It was clearly intentional and done in a way that the ref would thing was accidental, rather than an insinctive mistake. Same with his dive in the tackle on their line to stop the play.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
jobo
Posts: 3653
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 1:33 pm

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by jobo »

josie andrews wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:46 pm
josie andrews wrote: Mon Aug 17, 2020 2:43 pm Following the round 9 games in the Betfred Super League, the below charges have been issued by the RFL's Match Review Panel;

Luke Gale (Leeds Rhinos)
Grade A Dangerous throw - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Tomkins (Catalans Dragons)
Grade A Trip - 1 Match Penalty Notice


Reece Lyne (Wakefield Trinity)
Grade C Dangerous Contact - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Sam Moa (Catalans Dragons)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Tommy Makinson (St Helens)
Grade F Other Contrary Behaviour - Refer to Tribunal

Grant Millington (Castleford Tigers)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Grade A Dangerous Contact - 1 Match Penalty Notice (should the above charge be accepted

Matt Lees (St Helens)
Grade A Dangerous Contact - 0 Match Penalty Notice

Ben Murdoch-Masila (Warrington Wolves)
Grade C High tackle - 2 Match Penalty Notice

Blake Austin (Warrington Wolves)
Grade A Trip - 0 Match Penalty Notice


https://www.superleague.co.uk/article/1 ... ry-round-9
Crazy.

Think Sam must have a couple of enemies on the panel.
Nezza Faz
Posts: 1932
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by Nezza Faz »

Problem with Tomkins, being it was his first match back after suspension - for a trip !

Obviously previous taken into account.
josie andrews
Posts: 35575
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by josie andrews »

Makinson ban 5 games plus £500 fine! Reduced from Grade F to E & because of his previous clean record, & his remorse!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
User avatar
jaws1
Posts: 3211
Joined: Tue Apr 18, 2006 2:43 pm
Contact:

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by jaws1 »

Boll##ks excuse the pun how can it be downgraded from F to E even if he had a clean record i thought the grading was given according to the severity of the incident lad from Bradford got 8 matches for the same incident. Watching the repeat Makinson had more than 1 squeeze he cant even say it was an accident .
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by fozzieskem »

Just ridiculous it really is, so when it happens again its now just a 5 game foul?

Utter nonsense, if which im sad to say I would,Watts had rightly knocked him into next week he would have been looking at a huge ban..I really am tiring of the ludicrous way this sort of thing is worked out
moto748
Posts: 4583
Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2014 5:30 pm

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by moto748 »

josie andrews wrote: Thu Aug 20, 2020 6:45 am Makinson ... his remorse!
Should have used sanitising gel?
Nezza Faz
Posts: 1932
Joined: Sun Jan 23, 2011 10:05 pm

Re: Disciplinary Round 9

Post by Nezza Faz »

fozzieskem wrote: Thu Aug 20, 2020 9:03 am Just ridiculous it really is, so when it happens again its now just a 5 game foul?

Utter nonsense, if which im sad to say I would,Watts had rightly knocked him into next week he would have been looking at a huge ban..I really am tiring of the ludicrous way this sort of thing is worked out
Yes, but the judiciary said it was the full 8 game tariff, only reduced to 5 in this instance because of his previous good record being taken into account (never been sent off) and his guilty plea.

Much the same as what happens in a criminal case in the law courts to a 1st time offender.
Post Reply