flower banned 2 matches
flower banned 2 matches
There are 10 types of people, those who get binary and those who dont!
-
- Posts: 26
- Joined: Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:36 am
Re: flower banned 2 matches
Absolutely ridiculous. If you get a ban for this they might as well play touch rugby
-
- Posts: 35784
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: flower banned 2 matches
I thought exactly the same! Set of tossers on the match review panel!Southport steve wrote: ↑Mon Sep 07, 2020 12:48 pm Absolutely ridiculous. If you get a ban for this they might as well play touch rugby
Talk about going off previous offences!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 1466
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: flower banned 2 matches
I despair of the way that RL is being administered. No fewer than 5 Wigan players were reported (by whom?) in a match where there was no serious or even non-serious foul play to get upset about. I can't even remember Flower's 55th minute transgression, let alone work out why it's worth a 2 match ban.
The only serious incident in the whole weekend was the alleged biting in the Warrington match and that seems to have been swept under the carpet (Footage inconclusive - further investigation - don't hold your breath - nothing to see here - move along please)
I'm trying not to get paranoid and think that there's an agenda against Wigan but well..........................
The only serious incident in the whole weekend was the alleged biting in the Warrington match and that seems to have been swept under the carpet (Footage inconclusive - further investigation - don't hold your breath - nothing to see here - move along please)
I'm trying not to get paranoid and think that there's an agenda against Wigan but well..........................
-
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2019 6:29 pm
Re: flower banned 2 matches
Can’t help but think that Ben’s previous behaviour have been brought back into light.
What makes it worse is that Makinson got a reduced ban for being a ‘good boy’.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
What makes it worse is that Makinson got a reduced ban for being a ‘good boy’.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Re: flower banned 2 matches
Description of Flowers tackle in minutes of Review Meeting is exactly same as James Bentley of Saints. Both Grade B offences. Flower gets two game ban, Bentley 0. For Castleford, Sao's tackle report sounds like a crusher, 1 game ban. Yes, it's easy to get paranoid!! Oh and not heard Darryl Powell whingeing!!
Re: flower banned 2 matches
Apologies, Bentley was same description of tackle as Flower but Grade A rather than Flower's Grade B, so not sure how that works! Sao was Grade B but only 1 match ban. Consistency ........
-
- Posts: 1625
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm
Re: flower banned 2 matches
I can't remember this. Was it put on report or just picked up after?
Re: flower banned 2 matches
I would think there's a likelihood the club will appeal the severity of the sentence, surely this is one they should say, needs to be looked at again.
Re: flower banned 2 matches
Nowt wrong wit tackle