hopefully your wrong fozzy....... i must admit ,ide love us to do them and not someone elsefozzieskem wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 9:03 pmFirestarter wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:48 pmLeeds wont be happy but lets be fair, they get more than there share of good luckfozzieskem wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 8:34 pm So 4 games it is then,plus an extra game for the high shot to begin with,fair I suppose in the end.
But ok if Kendall didn’t see it why on earth didn’t the video ref tell him what had gone on?or isn’t that in his remit?
They do but as ever in these matters it’s the next team that benefits from this sort of thing
Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5581
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
-
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
I wasn't Josie, I was expressing a view. A point - the rules don't change it is their interpretation that changes.josie andrews wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 6:42 pm Stop this ‘bitching’ please.
The “disciplinary rules” change every week & depending on the club & the player/s involved.
So please, stop bickering about rules & grades no one knows how they work!
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Joel Tomkins
And sadly that’s the correct call on it,why players feel the need to do this,and the summer outbreak of “squirrelling”is beyond me.
The tribunal set the wrong tone at the very start with makinson tgat was 5 games all day long and while bans after it have hit the jackpot to me you start off soft and well players will try it on,it’s human nature.
Players need to be reminded that this is a family sport and if an 8 game ban isn’t enough then fine them a weeks wages,500 quid isnt enough.
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
how many did Makinson get?
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
5 games because of good behaviour apparently which yes is fine but pulling the jewels for me should be an instant 8 game ban and a nasty fine,it’s disgusting grubby behaviour and if my child had done that in the playground he’d end up with a smacked bottom
-
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
Please! Please! This is supposed to be a happy occasion! Let's not bicker and argue about who killed who. We are here today to witness the union of two young people in the joyful bond of the holy wedlock.Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 10:49 pmI wasn't Josie, I was expressing a view. A point - the rules don't change it is their interpretation that changes.josie andrews wrote: ↑Tue Nov 17, 2020 6:42 pm Stop this ‘bitching’ please.
The “disciplinary rules” change every week & depending on the club & the player/s involved.
So please, stop bickering about rules & grades no one knows how they work!
Unfortunately, one of them, my son Herbert, has just fallen to his death.
But I don't want to think I've not lost a son, so much as... gained a daughter!
Wigan Saints
-
- Posts: 3259
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
So Saints get to play a weakened team, yet again. Let's hope that it will come as a shock to them, yet again, when they come up against us next week.
Wigan Saints
-
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Joel Tomkins
I fully agree.fozzieskem wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 7:28 amAnd sadly that’s the correct call on it,why players feel the need to do this,and the summer outbreak of “squirrelling”is beyond me.
The tribunal set the wrong tone at the very start with makinson tgat was 5 games all day long and while bans after it have hit the jackpot to me you start off soft and well players will try it on,it’s human nature.
Players need to be reminded that this is a family sport and if an 8 game ban isn’t enough then fine them a weeks wages,500 quid isnt enough.
-
- Posts: 4279
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Bans for McIlorum and Joel T?
It’s not Saints fault they didn’t commit the fouls.morley pie eater wrote: ↑Wed Nov 18, 2020 10:46 am So Saints get to play a weakened team, yet again. Let's hope that it will come as a shock to them, yet again, when they come up against us next week.