Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Bullock
Re: Bullock
Because he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 amThen why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
-
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Bullock
Mike wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 11:05 amBecause he is being effective albeit in shorter spells than we'd like?Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 amThen why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
He can’t be effective in a five minute spell? Do you have any statistics to support that claim Mike? That puts extra pressure on the other forwards. Personally, I think don’t think that Lam rates his defence.
Re: Bullock
Bullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s whyCharriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 amThen why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Re: Bullock
You didn't imagine it, cos I remember that too!
Although whether it is correct, I have no idea. You would expect if he had left the Club, there would have been an official announcement.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5584
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Bullock
Well bullock is dropped or injured or even rested coz hes not playing tonight
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Re: Bullock
What the hell is Lam playing at, no Bullock in the team and Mitch Clark gets a bench position?
Mitch Clark couldn't break out of a wet paper bag.
It also looks like Hardaker is on the wing?
Mitch Clark couldn't break out of a wet paper bag.
It also looks like Hardaker is on the wing?
-
- Posts: 4287
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Bullock
Barney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pmBullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s whyCharriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 amThen why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Not defensively he isn’t.
Re: Bullock
French isn’t great under the high ball but he’s played for his attack.Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 7:28 pmBarney841 wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 2:37 pmBullock is more effective for the time he’s on than most of our props who play most the game. That’s whyCharriots Offiah wrote: ↑Mon May 17, 2021 10:54 am
Then why play him. We want him to be effective not a number making up the squad.
Not defensively he isn’t.
Some players have weaknesses but if they help the team in other ways, the other players cover for them
Re: Bullock
Good break from Clarke to set up French try