Gildart

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
User avatar
wall_of_voodoo
Posts: 1231
Joined: Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:51 am

Re: Gildart

Post by wall_of_voodoo »

Well I recall irl_war was on the ball with news of wires recruitment of Williams, then there is no reason to not believe the other snippet of information he also posted that they have agreed terms with Gildart when he returns from the NRL the year after next

This ends the debate about him returning to us or not. He isn't and he has provisionally joined wire for 2023

We need to "get over it"
I'm a better fan than you
Because I don't "Boo"!!!

Yes I bloody know transfer fees do not count on the salary cap for those illiterates that need it explaining to them because they assume everyone is as thick as they are :roll:
up the junction
Posts: 363
Joined: Fri Jan 25, 2013 10:42 am

Re: Gildart

Post by up the junction »

The Coach needs to up his game , they don’t become bad players overnight ! It’s being coached out of them , it’s like they don’t know how to play together . Oli Gidart is still one the best home products we have had in a long time , to say otherwise is ridiculous.
Caboosegg
Posts: 3875
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by Caboosegg »

medlocke wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:51 pm
Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:52 am
medlocke wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:14 am

And then nice uncle Lenners will say "come back home to Wigan Oli, Here's a nice new 4 season contract"
Then the sheep/Lenners loyal/Happy clappers will hail Lenners as a hero for bringing him back :D
So if he struggles in the NRL and comes back would you like to see him go to another club?

I imagine he'd do a Williams anyway and go for a "new challenge "
1. Why would I want to re-sign a former player who chose big money over playing for Wigan

2. Why would I want a former player that struggled and failed in the NRL

3. Before anybody mentions it, I couldn't care less about the usual "it's a short game crap", You either want to play for the most famous RL club in the world or you don't, If you are as good as you think you are then you will get paid well

4. Sorry if I offended anybody with my earlier comment above
Haven't been the biggest club in RL for years :lol: the challenge Cup record will be gone in the next couple of seasons.

The cap means we are on a level playing field.

Who's to say he will fail (I personally don't think he is bulky enough) and doesn't choose to come back like Bateman or Williams who are hardly failures.

If we need a better centre and a player is the best one available I don't care if they are an ex player or not
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
medlocke
Posts: 10669
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Gildart

Post by medlocke »

Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 5:50 pm
medlocke wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:51 pm
Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:52 am

So if he struggles in the NRL and comes back would you like to see him go to another club?

I imagine he'd do a Williams anyway and go for a "new challenge "
1. Why would I want to re-sign a former player who chose big money over playing for Wigan

2. Why would I want a former player that struggled and failed in the NRL

3. Before anybody mentions it, I couldn't care less about the usual "it's a short game crap", You either want to play for the most famous RL club in the world or you don't, If you are as good as you think you are then you will get paid well

4. Sorry if I offended anybody with my earlier comment above
Haven't been the biggest club in RL for years :lol: the challenge Cup record will be gone in the next couple of seasons.

The cap means we are on a level playing field.

Who's to say he will fail (I personally don't think he is bulky enough) and doesn't choose to come back like Bateman or Williams who are hardly failures.

If we need a better centre and a player is the best one available I don't care if they are an ex player or not
Where did I say biggest :oops: :lol:
Charriots Offiah
Posts: 4272
Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by Charriots Offiah »

Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 5:50 pm
medlocke wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:51 pm
Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:52 am

So if he struggles in the NRL and comes back would you like to see him go to another club?

I imagine he'd do a Williams anyway and go for a "new challenge "
1. Why would I want to re-sign a former player who chose big money over playing for Wigan

2. Why would I want a former player that struggled and failed in the NRL

3. Before anybody mentions it, I couldn't care less about the usual "it's a short game crap", You either want to play for the most famous RL club in the world or you don't, If you are as good as you think you are then you will get paid well

4. Sorry if I offended anybody with my earlier comment above
Haven't been the biggest club in RL for years :lol: the challenge Cup record will be gone in the next couple of seasons.

The cap means we are on a level playing field.

Who's to say he will fail (I personally don't think he is bulky enough) and doesn't choose to come back like Bateman or Williams who are hardly failures.

If we need a better centre and a player is the best one available I don't care if they are an ex player or not
How do you work that out?
Caboosegg
Posts: 3875
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by Caboosegg »

Charriots Offiah wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 8:15 pm
Caboosegg wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 5:50 pm
medlocke wrote: Sat Jul 03, 2021 3:51 pm

1. Why would I want to re-sign a former player who chose big money over playing for Wigan

2. Why would I want a former player that struggled and failed in the NRL

3. Before anybody mentions it, I couldn't care less about the usual "it's a short game crap", You either want to play for the most famous RL club in the world or you don't, If you are as good as you think you are then you will get paid well

4. Sorry if I offended anybody with my earlier comment above
Haven't been the biggest club in RL for years :lol: the challenge Cup record will be gone in the next couple of seasons.

The cap means we are on a level playing field.

Who's to say he will fail (I personally don't think he is bulky enough) and doesn't choose to come back like Bateman or Williams who are hardly failures.

If we need a better centre and a player is the best one available I don't care if they are an ex player or not
How do you work that out?
Ha, I thought someone had caught up but checking again I am wrong :lol: last win 2013 though
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
cherry toffee
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 10:42 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by cherry toffee »

So the challenge cup alone defines if a team are big or not?
Caboosegg
Posts: 3875
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by Caboosegg »

cherry toffee wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2021 12:29 pm So the challenge cup alone defines if a team are big or not?
Where has anyone even said that?
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
cherry toffee
Posts: 226
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2015 10:42 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by cherry toffee »

You said they hadn’t been biggest club for years and gave the challenge cup as your only reason
Caboosegg
Posts: 3875
Joined: Tue Oct 14, 2014 4:51 pm

Re: Gildart

Post by Caboosegg »

cherry toffee wrote: Sun Jul 04, 2021 12:56 pm You said they hadn’t been biggest club for years and gave the challenge cup as your only reason
No I didn't I said we haven't been the biggest club in years and suggested we are going to lose our record in the challenge cup soon (incorrectly)

If we were the biggest club in RL player would want to sign for Wigan not just have us as an 'option' we also wouldn't be losing players to the NRL.

If its accepted that the NRL is miles ahead of superleague and we see Wigan youngsters aiming to get an NRL Gig then how can anyone say we are the biggest club in NRL.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Post Reply