Exactly. Nail on the head. If only people thought this way about Hankinson too. ….. but, but, but he can kickWigan_forever1985 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:37 am I’m not sure I agree that he didn’t get a fair crack of the whip as I think there is something clearly about him
I said when he signed and we’re told by hapless rads that he was one of superleagues most destructive forwards - he never broke into any team he played for
He’s played at Cas/featherstone/Halifax and Leigh before joining us and none of those teams thought he was good enough - not did he start for any of those teams
The fact the only clubs looks at him are championship clubs tells you everything you need to know - sadly it would be the same for a good few of our squad if they left they wouldn’t get another super league gig
Mitch Clark
Re: Mitch Clark
- EDINBURGH-WARRIOR
- Posts: 1130
- Joined: Sat May 30, 2009 1:23 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
The biggest worry for me was what was KR banging on about when we signed him .
2002 and EW is hooked
-
- Posts: 4185
- Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
He is out of his depth.EDINBURGH-WARRIOR wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:52 am The biggest worry for me was what was KR banging on about when we signed him .
When Liverpool make a signing, Klopp does his best to downplay any expectations attached to the price tag, says it will take a while for them to adapt to Liverpool's systems and we won't see the best of them straight away.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Re: Mitch Clark
It's hard to see why his signing was based on any more rigorous analysis than
a) He had a good game against us at Cas, and
b) He was available.
a) He had a good game against us at Cas, and
b) He was available.
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Mitch Clark
I have to agree simply he wasn't up to it,sometimes it's that simple I hope though he finds himself a club soonWigan_forever1985 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:37 am I’m not sure I agree that he didn’t get a fair crack of the whip as I think there is something clearly about him
I said when he signed and we’re told by hapless rads that he was one of superleagues most destructive forwards - he never broke into any team he played for
He’s played at Cas/featherstone/Halifax and Leigh before joining us and none of those teams thought he was good enough - not did he start for any of those teams
The fact the only clubs looks at him are championship clubs tells you everything you need to know - sadly it would be the same for a good few of our squad if they left they wouldn’t get another super league gig
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Mitch Clark
Better than Botica and Richards that ladDan2266 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:51 amExactly. Nail on the head. If only people thought this way about Hankinson too. ….. but, but, but he can kickWigan_forever1985 wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 11:37 am I’m not sure I agree that he didn’t get a fair crack of the whip as I think there is something clearly about him
I said when he signed and we’re told by hapless rads that he was one of superleagues most destructive forwards - he never broke into any team he played for
He’s played at Cas/featherstone/Halifax and Leigh before joining us and none of those teams thought he was good enough - not did he start for any of those teams
The fact the only clubs looks at him are championship clubs tells you everything you need to know - sadly it would be the same for a good few of our squad if they left they wouldn’t get another super league gig![]()
-
- Posts: 2696
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 1:18 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
Honestly, I think Botica was made to look a far better player than he was by the quality around him at the time. I can’t recall a single time he put a man through a gap. Though he could kick goals (ironically, we would still have won everything with no kicker at all...).
-
- Posts: 1365
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 5:34 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
sorry, got to disagree with that statementExiled Wiganer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 2:14 pm Honestly, I think Botica was made to look a far better player than he was by the quality around him at the time. I can’t recall a single time he put a man through a gap. Though he could kick goals (ironically, we would still have won everything with no kicker at all...).
he initially started wing and then moved to stand off, and could play a bit, plus played full back for NZ
-
- Posts: 1470
- Joined: Tue Jun 26, 2012 5:15 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
Clark didn't do himself any favours with his performances but when he was played after a long time out, he was impressive. Unfortunately, he then dropped back to bang-average and looked right at home in our forwards. Shame we messed with his career and didn't let him go to Toulouse.
We have form at doing that.
We have form at doing that.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5559
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: Mitch Clark
Edwards hardly put players through a gap but was still great( it was gregory that did)….. i do remember botica putting skerrett through for our first try against widnes at wembleyExiled Wiganer wrote: ↑Wed Oct 13, 2021 2:14 pm Honestly, I think Botica was made to look a far better player than he was by the quality around him at the time. I can’t recall a single time he put a man through a gap. Though he could kick goals (ironically, we would still have won everything with no kicker at all...).
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE