disciplinary
-
- Posts: 36239
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: disciplinary
Wigan Warriors’ John Bateman cited in Match Review Panel for curious incident
Following the Betfred Challenge Cup Final, the Match Review Panel have issued the following sanctions:
Luke Yates (Huddersfield) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – 0 Match Penalty Notice
Luke Yates (Huddersfield) – Grade B High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
Morgan Smithies (Wigan) – Grade C High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
Morgan Smithies (Wigan) – Grade B High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
However, cited in amongst those was Wigan Warriors forward John Bateman for an incident which occurred in the 28th minute of the Challenge Cup Final clash against Huddersfield Giants.
The Match Review Panel cited the England international as ‘intentionally’ standing on a Huddersfield player. However, he has not been banned because “Player puts foot down and immediately feels arm under his foot and takes the foot away.”
Remarkably, for Huddersfield only Luke Yates was cited with no other Giants player called before the Match Review Panel.
It was a very tense and cagey affair throughout the final on Saturday afternoon as over 51,000 made their way inside the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium for the first time in rugby league.
https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/wigan-wa ... ent-53788/
Following the Betfred Challenge Cup Final, the Match Review Panel have issued the following sanctions:
Luke Yates (Huddersfield) – Grade A Dangerous Contact – 0 Match Penalty Notice
Luke Yates (Huddersfield) – Grade B High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
Morgan Smithies (Wigan) – Grade C High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
Morgan Smithies (Wigan) – Grade B High Tackle – 2 Match Penalty Notice
However, cited in amongst those was Wigan Warriors forward John Bateman for an incident which occurred in the 28th minute of the Challenge Cup Final clash against Huddersfield Giants.
The Match Review Panel cited the England international as ‘intentionally’ standing on a Huddersfield player. However, he has not been banned because “Player puts foot down and immediately feels arm under his foot and takes the foot away.”
Remarkably, for Huddersfield only Luke Yates was cited with no other Giants player called before the Match Review Panel.
It was a very tense and cagey affair throughout the final on Saturday afternoon as over 51,000 made their way inside the Tottenham Hotspur Stadium for the first time in rugby league.
https://www.seriousaboutrl.com/wigan-wa ... ent-53788/
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Re: disciplinary
My thoughts exactly. Trial by media. Disciplinary panel reacting to media hype. What with the “best team lost” nonsense and the level of coverage these tackles got post match you’d be forgiven thinking it was an orchestrated campaign to get him a long ban.josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 2:03 pm Think it’s a bit harsh! Watson & his continual moaning about it!
So will Child get reprimanded & banned for a few games for not punishing them during the game??
Re: disciplinary
So Yates gets two matches for something Child didn't even penalise.
-
- Posts: 3251
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Re: disciplinary
Child is just not a big game referee.
- Firestarter
- Posts: 5684
- Joined: Fri Mar 20, 2015 10:07 pm
Re: disciplinary
Still nothing for the cheap shot on marshy?josie andrews wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 2:03 pm Think it’s a bit harsh! Watson & his continual moaning about it!
So will Child get reprimanded & banned for a few games for not punishing them during the game??
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
-
- Posts: 36239
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: disciplinary
The charges for Morgan are both for a high tackle but one is a grade C 2 match ban & grade B 2 match
ban!!!
Why?? Two different grades?
ban!!!
Why?? Two different grades?
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 1399
- Joined: Sun May 22, 2005 5:34 pm
Re: disciplinary
they'll be looking at intent etcjosie andrews wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 5:17 pm The charges for Morgan are both for a high tackle but one is a grade C 2 match ban & grade B 2 match
ban!!!
Why?? Two different grades?
for me, the first one catches Greenwood, but looked like he was trying to dislodge the ball - penalty, but nowt else. Ref wasnt giving anything until the Hudds players started waving their arms
2nd one, swinging arm, but bit of slap across the chops, credit to Leutele for just getting up and making nothing of it. Current rules, probably worth the 2 games, but not much more
Singleton knee to head (may just have been an accident) looked at ref nothing, Faz nothing, so why did he stop and take notice of the Hudds players?
-
- Posts: 1665
- Joined: Wed May 20, 2015 2:13 pm
Re: disciplinary
One of the things creeping into the game at the moment is players "milking" the penalty, especially where the video ref can review the footage.
Not something we should be proud about.
Not something we should be proud about.
Re: disciplinary
There was absolutely nothing in the Greenwood tackle it slid up into his Jaw and then Greenwood played for the penalty I can't help but feel if Watson hadn't said something it wouldn't have gone further.
The second one deserves the ban I thought he had punched the guy at first and it was only the replay that showed he hadn't.
The second one deserves the ban I thought he had punched the guy at first and it was only the replay that showed he hadn't.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: disciplinary
100% agree they’re all at it and needs stopping.Wintergreen wrote: ↑Mon May 30, 2022 6:55 pm One of the things creeping into the game at the moment is players "milking" the penalty, especially where the video ref can review the footage.
Not something we should be proud about.