Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
-
- Posts: 1125
- Joined: Tue Oct 01, 2019 7:58 pm
Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/rugby-league/62150869
Anyone think the Wildcats years in SL are coming to an end? Reads doom and gloom on their forum, some very anxious fans looking at their remaining fixtures.
Anyone think the Wildcats years in SL are coming to an end? Reads doom and gloom on their forum, some very anxious fans looking at their remaining fixtures.
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Relegation is a stupid system for rugby league anyway and the people who suggested it need shooting.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
-
- Posts: 37320
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
I’ve said this for years! But the people running our sport are spineless morons. They let Wakefield, Castleford & Bradford get away with substandard grounds & facilities & they are still substandard grounds & facilitiesCaboosegg wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 8:38 pm Relegation is a stupid system for rugby league anyway and the people who suggested it need shooting.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
-
- Posts: 3379
- Joined: Fri Apr 25, 2014 9:31 pm
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Wakefield have Saints at home next which they'll probably lose.
Toulouse have Salford visiting and after today's result a home win is by no means guaranteed.
Still all to play for at the bottom.
As for the structure, 14 teams who would have to provide facilities in the three years licence term. Fourteen teams, 13 games home, 13 game away plus Magic. No loop games. With Leigh we'd certainly have to open the North Stand, wouldn't surprise me if it was the same for Fev.
Toulouse have Salford visiting and after today's result a home win is by no means guaranteed.
Still all to play for at the bottom.
As for the structure, 14 teams who would have to provide facilities in the three years licence term. Fourteen teams, 13 games home, 13 game away plus Magic. No loop games. With Leigh we'd certainly have to open the North Stand, wouldn't surprise me if it was the same for Fev.
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
So when Wakefield don't stick to the criteria like last time, kick them out and let them lose fans who will not come backCaboosegg wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 8:38 pm Relegation is a stupid system for rugby league anyway and the people who suggested it need shooting.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
-
- Posts: 4754
- Joined: Fri Sep 18, 2020 1:14 pm
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Let’s see what the management group come up with.
-
- Posts: 3470
- Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
It seems like a neat idea, Ted. But I suggest that there may be other considerations.Wiganer Ted wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 9:26 pm Wakefield have Saints at home next which they'll probably lose.
Toulouse have Salford visiting and after today's result a home win is by no means guaranteed.
Still all to play for at the bottom.
As for the structure, 14 teams who would have to provide facilities in the three years licence term. Fourteen teams, 13 games home, 13 game away plus Magic. No loop games. With Leigh we'd certainly have to open the North Stand, wouldn't surprise me if it was the same for Fev.
We currently have 12 teams. Anyone could pick 20 or 30 players from the rosters of the likes of Wakey, Hull KR, Toulouse, Salford, and any team not in the top 4, who Wigan wouldn't touch with a bargepole. And a fair percentage of SL players are Islanders and other NRL rejects or has-beens. The quality is not great outside the top 4.
Now pray tell me where these 2 extra teams are going to get their players from?
And how will they pay them when the cap is reduced, as TV income will fall by over 14% due to being shared between 14 teams rather than 12?
Oh, and Featherstone's population is 15,244.
Wigan Saints
-
- Posts: 6494
- Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
Good points Morley,there simply isn’t the quality for extra teams not sure why people can’t see that to be honest.morley pie eater wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 9:51 pmIt seems like a neat idea, Ted. But I suggest that there may be other considerations.Wiganer Ted wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 9:26 pm Wakefield have Saints at home next which they'll probably lose.
Toulouse have Salford visiting and after today's result a home win is by no means guaranteed.
Still all to play for at the bottom.
As for the structure, 14 teams who would have to provide facilities in the three years licence term. Fourteen teams, 13 games home, 13 game away plus Magic. No loop games. With Leigh we'd certainly have to open the North Stand, wouldn't surprise me if it was the same for Fev.
We currently have 12 teams. Anyone could pick 20 or 30 players from the rosters of the likes of Wakey, Hull KR, Toulouse, Salford, and any team not in the top 4, who Wigan wouldn't touch with a bargepole. And a fair percentage of SL players are Islanders and other NRL rejects or has-beens. The quality is not great outside the top 4.
Now pray tell me where these 2 extra teams are going to get their players from?
And how will they pay them when the cap is reduced, as TV income will fall by over 14% due to being shared between 14 teams rather than 12?
Oh, and Featherstone's population is 15,244.
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
If they new theynhad a criteria to meet and continued to avoid doing so then yes as that's very different to relegation.medlocke wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 9:31 pmSo when Wakefield don't stick to the criteria like last time, kick them out and let them lose fans who will not come backCaboosegg wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 8:38 pm Relegation is a stupid system for rugby league anyway and the people who suggested it need shooting.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
While it's easy to point at the teams lower down imagine the damage Wigan being relegated would do to the club.
These are two reasons not to trust people.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
1. We don't know them.
2. We do know them.
Re: Wakefield Trinity Wildcats
It is different but has the same outcomeCaboosegg wrote: ↑Mon Jul 18, 2022 7:17 amIf they new they had a criteria to meet and continued to avoid doing so then yes as that's very different to relegation.medlocke wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 9:31 pmSo when Wakefield don't stick to the criteria like last time, kick them out and let them lose fans who will not come backCaboosegg wrote: ↑Sun Jul 17, 2022 8:38 pm Relegation is a stupid system for rugby league anyway and the people who suggested it need shooting.
If Wakefield drop down they will lose fans who will not come back even if they got back up.
Should be licences again but actually hold the clubs to the criteria instead of letting them off the hook.
While it's easy to point at the teams lower down imagine the damage Wigan being relegated would do to the club.