No, that's not it. 2 points for the winner, 1 point for the loser. So your guaranteed 1 point at the end of a drawn match and you're playing for the "bonus" winning point in extra time. You can't get 3.
Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
I think you are reading it wrong, and nobody is suggesting that.
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
Fair comment. My misunderstanding
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
It should be 1 point each if drawing after 80 minutes. The added hype isn’t needed.
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
When players have toiled to 80 minutes for a draw, I think it's a bit rubbish to decide it by a drop-goalathon.
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
Im also not a fan of Golden Point.
I would say if it has to be Golden Point it should be Golden Try, drop goalathon is not good to watch or a good way to win/lose, i realise we scored a try.
This is just my opinion
I would say if it has to be Golden Point it should be Golden Try, drop goalathon is not good to watch or a good way to win/lose, i realise we scored a try.
This is just my opinion
-
- Posts: 381
- Joined: Sun Oct 31, 2021 10:17 am
Re: Golden Point comes under scrutiny but key point ensures concept is here to stay
At first blush it seems feasible. Certainly food for thought