Call for review of disciplinary crackdown after huge number of bans to the start of Super League season

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
Post Reply
josie andrews
Posts: 35788
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Call for review of disciplinary crackdown after huge number of bans to the start of Super League season

Post by josie andrews »

TONY SMITH has called for less severe punishments from the match review panel after retrospective action was taken against 16 players following the opening round of Super League.

A new head-contact framework introduced for 2024 contributed significantly to four red cards and nine yellow cards being shown in the six round-one games.

As well as greater punishments being handed out on the field, the RFL is also clamping down on foul play through a stricter disciplinary process.


All four red-carded players received bans: Hull FC’s Franklin Pele and Ligi Sao have been given three- and one-match suspensions respectively, while Catalans’ Michael McIlorum and Liam Watts of Castleford must sit out four games.

Four of the nine players sinbinned in the opening rounds were also suspended, while a further two were fined – including Wigan’s Harry Smith, who was free to play in the World Club Challenge after avoiding a ban.

With eight Super League players missing last weekend through suspension – and Tom Amone and Ricky Leutele of Leigh, who didn’t play, will join them this week unless their bans are overturned on appeal – there is concern the crackdown has been too harsh.

While not disputing any particular punishment given to his own players, Hull FC coach Smith has questioned the current approach.


“Everybody understands that we need to change our tackling methods and styles, and our sport demands that, and our insurers demand that. Things have to change to make our game safer,” he said.

“I think there’s a nervousness within our sport about how quickly we can do that through cards and suspensions.

“Sinbins and send-offs can change the outcomes of games, particularly in Rugby League. They shouldn’t be underestimated, so to then add a number of matches on top of that, we’re worried.

“We’re worried that we’re going to have reserve-grade teams play each other, which means our superstars are all sitting in the stands serving suspensions.

“We’re doing our best to try and alter some of the methods, but how severely do we want to treat our players? We need to look at how we’re going with it.

“I think we need some big, grown-up discussions and some debates about the severity of the punishments. That’s the big concern.”

Following the release of the match review panel’s charges last week, the RFL’s director of operations and legal, Robert Hicks, explained the disciplinary approach.

He said: “As we have outlined in various forums in the build-up to the Super League season, there have been a number of changes to the head contact sanctioning framework for 2024 – and match officials and the match review panel share the responsibility for implementing these changes.

“The number of yellow and red cards shown in the opening round of the Super League has already become a talking point, and doubtless the number of charges arising from the MRP meeting will be similar – but it is important to provide some context.

“Of the 13 cards shown, ten of the incidents would have led to a card being shown under the framework that applied in 2023.

“One area which has made a difference is in head-on-head contact, and the responsibility of attacking and tackling players in this area.

“Just as the sport should be grateful to the commitment of match officials and the MRP in implementing change at such a pivotal period for the sport, we also reiterate our gratitude to clubs, coaches and players for their positive approach over recent months.”

The panel also came under scrutiny when four punishments were later downgraded.

Ryan Brierley of Salford and Castleford’s Charbel Tasipale had one-match bans reduced to fines on appeal, Catalans’ Paul Séguier had a two-game suspension halved, while Sao was initially given a three-match ban.

https://www.totalrl.com/call-for-review ... ue-season/
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
josie andrews
Posts: 35788
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Call for review of disciplinary crackdown after huge number of bans to the start of Super League season

Post by josie andrews »

RFL amend head contact framework after 'lack of clarity' in Fa'amanu Brown's red card

The RFL will amend their framework on head-on-head contact.

The Rugby Football League have admitted that Fa'amanu Brown's red card on Friday night caused 'controversy and confusion.' They have also admitted that the decision from the Match Review Panel to not suspend Brown underlines a 'lack of clarity' in the guidelines.

Brown was sent off following an accidental clash of heads with Warrington Wolves forward Ben Currie, bringing criticism from all quarters of the game. As a result, the governing body will amend their framework on head-on-head contact after some strict law changes prior to the start of the year.

The RFL have altered such incidents to now only apply when 'initial contact' is with the head. For context, Brown's initial contact was well below chest height before he was swung around in the tackle, causing the collision with Currie.

Posting a full statement alongside this Monday's disciplinary outcome, which saw Brown avoid a charge, they said: "The RFL acknowledges that the implementation of the new Head Contact Sentencing Framework caused controversy and confusion during Round Two of the Betfred Super League.

This was most obvious in Friday’s match at Warrington Wolves, with the dismissal of Hull FC’s Nu Brown late in the first half. On studying the incident, the MRP decided it did not merit a charge under the Framework. This has highlighted a lack of clarity in the procedures regarding head-on-head contact, which left the officials at Friday’s game in an invidious position.

"The section of the Framework relating to head-on-head contact will now be amended, emphasising that it applies only to initial contact. Once the mechanics of the tackle become more fluid, officials are able to use their knowledge and game-understanding to mitigate the sanction, to reflect the level of culpability of the tackler.

"This point will be reinforced to Betfred Super League head coaches at a pre-arranged meeting on Wednesday, and to playing representatives of all 12 Super League clubs at a separate meeting later in the day."

https://www.hulldailymail.co.uk/sport/r ... rk-9125527
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Post Reply