Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 9:53 pm
I knew that,im always scared when either him french or smith get a knock.I do believe we are knackered without them three
As Lammy found out. But you take the three best players out of any side and it will significantly weaken them. We're not much different to others in that regard. However, our defence and commitment will remain, even if we lack attacking flare.
As Lammy found out. But you take the three best players out of any side and it will significantly weaken them. We're not much different to others in that regard. However, our defence and commitment will remain, even if we lack attacking flare.
Spot on
Except that it's 'flair'!
I wasn’t going to pull him up on his spelling, seen other examples too. But he isn’t the only one
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
Firestarter wrote: ↑Thu Mar 21, 2024 9:53 pm
I knew that,im always scared when either him french or smith get a knock.I do believe we are knackered without them three
As Lammy found out. But you take the three best players out of any side and it will significantly weaken them. We're not much different to others in that regard. However, our defence and commitment will remain, even if we lack attacking flare.
I disagree mike ,no other super league team has three players anywhere near these three.Unfortunately all our attack is based on these three.
So name saints best three attacking players and tell me how they would have the same attacking threat without them.
Incidentally, that “flare/flair” comment may be entirely misconceived. Lots of people end up replacing one word with another which sounds the same (a homonym I think it’s called), either because of phone etc spellcheck or a simple lapse in concentration. I often get their and there mixed up not because I don’t no the difference, but just because when I am in a hurry or tired I get it wrong. Anyway, as long as we understand what is being said, its all gud to mi.
As Lammy found out. But you take the three best players out of any side and it will significantly weaken them. We're not much different to others in that regard. However, our defence and commitment will remain, even if we lack attacking flare.
I disagree mike ,no other super league team has three players anywhere near these three.Unfortunately all our attack is based on these three.
So name saints best three attacking players and tell me how they would have the same attacking threat without them.
Lomax welsby and the hooker.Yes they would be weakened but they are no way as influential as our three
IF YOU STRIKE ME DOWN I WILL BECOME MORE POWERFUL THAN YOU CAN POSSIBLY IMAGINE
Clearly taking no chances, a very strong 17 named. I thought we'd rest a couple more so I hope we end the evening injury free. Best of luck to the boys.
Exiled Wiganer wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:11 pm
Incidentally, that “flare/flair” comment may be entirely misconceived. Lots of people end up replacing one word with another which sounds the same (a homonym I think it’s called), either because of phone etc spellcheck or a simple lapse in concentration. I often get their and there mixed up not because I don’t no the difference, but just because when I am in a hurry or tired I get it wrong. Anyway, as long as we understand what is being said, its all gud to mi.
nice.