Is the conspiracy genuine?

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Is the conspiracy genuine?

Post by cpwigan »

Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
thegimble
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: Is the conspiracy genuine?

Post by thegimble »

cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Refs `R Bent
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat May 13, 2006 10:06 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by Refs `R Bent »

well this is my 1st post and as my username implies, I agree with the comments the decison to give a knock on was a digrace, if this was football there'd be a major outcry about betting scandals (wonder what odds Presley had on his betting slip), makes u sick when one of the worst refs of all times Cummins is his boss but suppose they all learn hatred for wigan from early on. He should never sit as a 4th official ever again. Still 14 rounds to go I still expect em to stay up but it's about time Noble started weilding that big axe
oval balls
Posts: 151
Joined: Wed Mar 08, 2006 12:59 am

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by oval balls »

i am sitting here asolutely appalled at the standard of refereeing a game
even stevo said it was a try and it plainly showed the wakwey players hand on the ball and pulling down so therefore playon. richards grounded ball= TRY unless you are a st helens video ref with scummings in your ear saying no try :angry: :angry: :angry:
wigans turning blue- my arse






User avatar
superleague
Posts: 1766
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2005 9:38 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by superleague »

aye it was a bad decision and i agree that could be the decision that sends us down :angry: :(
User avatar
Fujiman
Posts: 3129
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by Fujiman »

thegimble posted:
cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
thegimble
Posts: 5901
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by thegimble »

Fujiman posted:
thegimble posted:
cpwigan posted:
Jesus Crest, a referee on the field of play can make a mistake, fair play but an ex referee watching several replays on TV. The damn ball was knocked out of his hands. How the hell can he knock on otherwise the ball was tucked into his chest. Ball stripped, loose ball grounded = try. Do these bastards want a SL without us.
Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
How you work that out.

That was a Try. Wed have won .
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by cpwigan »

This not good enough business is stupid. Good enough for what? Our only aim this season is not to finish bottom or next to bottom if Catalan are below us. That's all. We had a game won. Yes, we are not great but neither are Wakefield, neither are Castleford, neither are London, neither are Huddersfield. We need the points we earned and by god we earned that win.
User avatar
Fujiman
Posts: 3129
Joined: Mon May 01, 2006 1:19 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by Fujiman »

thegimble posted:
Fujiman posted:
thegimble posted: Seems that way. That was a bad call and if you ask me its just sent us down. Wakey were gone and were holding on.

FUC@@@@@ Cheats.
Yes it was a bad result BUT WE WERE NOT GOOD ENOUGH!!
How you work that out.

That was a Try. Wed have won .
Youre grasping at straws Yes it should have been given but then again we shouldn't need to rely on a video ref to win If we were good enough, which we wern't, that would have just been to make the points diffrence better
turf
Posts: 5539
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2005 10:53 pm

Re: Is the conspiracy genu...

Post by turf »

Steve Presley, is a waste of a video ref. That try for Richards that he wrongly disallowed will send us DOWN. He DESPERATELY needs his eyes testing.

Also, I thought Ganson was a joke tonight, as was most of our players ie, Moran, Dallas, Tickle etc, the list is endless isn't it.
Post Reply