FEKA

Discuss all things Wigan Warriors. Comments and opinions on all aspects of the club's performance are welcome.
nathan_rugby
Posts: 4185
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm

FEKA

Post by nathan_rugby »

Why is this guy sub again ?
He is obviously being used as an impact player but didnt seem to get much of a game against saints.
Mind you our props more or less use to swap after 12 mins so it is really same as starting.
Anybody know why he is sub
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: FEKA

Post by Doveoverdave »

nathan_rugby posted:
Why is this guy sub again ?
He is obviously being used as an impact player but didnt seem to get much of a game against saints.
Mind you our props more or less use to swap after 12 mins so it is really same as starting.
Anybody know why he is sub
....because he is no good?
User avatar
Bear
Posts: 4224
Joined: Mon Mar 20, 2006 4:32 pm

Re: FEKA

Post by Bear »

Doveoverdave posted:
nathan_rugby posted:
Why is this guy sub again ?
He is obviously being used as an impact player but didnt seem to get much of a game against saints.
Mind you our props more or less use to swap after 12 mins so it is really same as starting.
Anybody know why he is sub
....because he is no good?
Cant be..... he`s proberbly the strongest prop wigan have He and Logan are the only ones running with conviction
OOOOOO were the greatest club in the world!!!!
User avatar
adrenalinxx
Posts: 1662
Joined: Mon Feb 21, 2005 9:26 pm

Re: FEKA

Post by adrenalinxx »

nathan_rugby posted:
Why is this guy sub again ?
He is obviously being used as an impact player but didnt seem to get much of a game against saints.
Mind you our props more or less use to swap after 12 mins so it is really same as starting.
Anybody know why he is sub
He's an impacted player always has been alwasy will be. Noble tried to use him in the same way Leeds use Lauititi.
nathan_rugby
Posts: 4185
Joined: Sun Apr 23, 2006 9:12 pm

Re: FEKA

Post by nathan_rugby »

he hasnt always been an impact player !
He was in the starting 13 for every match fit under millward.
Bomhead - "Lockers to prop."
Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: FEKA

Post by Doveoverdave »

He has been a poor acquisition this year.

He does not contribute enough and his reputation as an 'impact' player is a myth.

The first weeks of the season I called him a show pony and this is the case.
User avatar
standishcat
Posts: 729
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 1:58 pm

Re: FEKA

Post by standishcat »

and this is the case.
DOD has spoken. Therefore, this is gospel truth.

In my irrelevant opinion, Feka has been one of our better players. At least he makes yards.
Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: FEKA

Post by Doveoverdave »

DOD has spoken. Therefore, this is gospel truth.
More often than not!

Your learning missy :wink:
Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: FEKA

Post by Doveoverdave »

The_Bad_Guy posted:
Doveoverdave posted:
DOD has spoken. Therefore, this is gospel truth.
More often than not!

Your learning missy :wink:
well i gotta disagree DOD i think he's been our best prop by far this year and at times one of our best players overall
Your entitled to your opnion even though its wrong!

And to be honest to be the best player/prop at Wigan is no great honour at the moment.

But for the record Logan is currently top of the props with a possible 6/10 and he is worth double of any of the others.





Doveoverdave
Posts: 1949
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 9:36 am

Re: FEKA

Post by Doveoverdave »

Not for me he's not.

He's not on the pitch long enough and when he is all I see is 1 barnstoming sprint that ends at the first tackle and then he's carted off wasted for the nex 20 mins.

How on earth he has achieved the status of fans favourite heaven only knows.
Post Reply