Nine posted:
Well, not quite. Sorry to labour the point, but people can be both e.g. Samoan or Tongan citizens AND New Zealand citizens, just as one person can be both a NZ and a GB citizen. That's just a fact in law. (I don't think it applies to H though, but I'm not sure if his family heritage is Islander or Maori. It could potentially be both, just to confuse matters further.)
So if a player coming over here is a citizen of one of the Pacific Island nations he is a Kolpak, and there's nothing the RFL can do about it, even if he does have a Kiwi passport as well and has chosen to pay for the Kiwis. Which is another fact in law.
That is not entirely true as some nations have banned duel citizenship, although I don't think that Tonga and NZ have that law the case is more about duel nationality than due citizenship.
Many people claim nationality because it is their origin or the origin of their culture, someone from Tonga with NZ parents could claim they have NZ nationality without even living in NZ, but they could not claim citizenship.
I think in Hansen’s case he plays for NZ because of Nationality as NZ is his origin but he is an EU citizen.
The difference between Nationality and citizenship can cause from problems for example you can have English nationality and not English citizenship, but citizenship is the more legal of the two because it gives people the right to vote etc, were as nationality is an identity.
Hansen has British citizenship but NZ nationality now it is obvious from that were the problem lies, his identity is as a New Zealander but legally he is a English citizen as Hansen could vote in England but not in NZ. So is it citizenship or nationality that decides what country you play for and whether you’re an overseas player or is it impossible to have just one?