Page 2 of 2

Re: Hooper retires due to ...

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 12:22 pm
by Cruncher
Sutty posted:
shawcross da warrior posted:
i dont understand why we offloaded him hes a good young player but then again thats what we do isnt it...... :roll:
If you are in any state of confusion why we offloaded so many promising young first teamers, try reading Mike Gregorys book. Maurice has a lot to answer for.
[/quote]

Fair point.

But does anyone genuinely believe that Saints rebuilding themselves with Wigan cast-offs is the way for them to go?

They recently bought Hargreaves. Now they're going for Wild. Despite our loss on Friday, would either of those two players be likely to figure in our first team?

Wild might at a push, but he wouldn't replace our first choice second row, and in the centres, I doub't he'd displace Goulding or Bailey.

Re: Hooper retires due to ...

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 9:42 pm
by shawcross da warrior
no probably not but he can play loose and who went off on friday...our looseforward and we didnt even have fletch fit to replace him there......

in comes stephen wild in my opinion.....

Re: Hooper retires due to inju...

Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 9:53 pm
by OAMJSONA
if i was Wild i wud stay where i was

Stains will be on the slide soon