Page 2 of 2

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:16 pm
by Banksy
What kind of relation are you to him?

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:27 pm
by shawcross da warrior
its not me its mi mums b.f but they are engaged so he is mi mums b.f cousin....


Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Tue Jul 17, 2007 10:53 pm
by butt monkey
Both signings for Salford are hardly the most inspiring, nor are they likely imo, to see much improvement in form either.

Just squad men, signed to replace injured players.

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 2:24 am
by DaveO
butt monkey posted:
Both signings for Salford are hardly the most inspiring, nor are they likely imo, to see much improvement in form either.

Just squad men, signed to replace injured players.
Undoubtedly. But what I want to know is why there isn't a general outcry that Salford are signing players to avoid the drop with complete disregard for the salary cap.

Dave

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 1:59 pm
by GeoffN
DaveO posted:
butt monkey posted:
Both signings for Salford are hardly the most inspiring, nor are they likely imo, to see much improvement in form either.

Just squad men, signed to replace injured players.
Undoubtedly. But what I want to know is why there isn't a general outcry that Salford are signing players to avoid the drop with complete disregard for the salary cap.

Dave
And now this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 904634.stm

Relegation-threatened Salford have made Warrington winger Richie Barnett their third signing in 24 hours.

Haven't read anything about needing RFL clearance for all these signings...one rule for us and one for the rest?

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Wed Jul 18, 2007 5:36 pm
by Bear
Ive heard barnets gone aswell

Re: wainright signs for sa...

Posted: Thu Jul 19, 2007 1:26 am
by butt monkey
GeoffN posted:
DaveO posted:
butt monkey posted:
Both signings for Salford are hardly the most inspiring, nor are they likely imo, to see much improvement in form either.

Just squad men, signed to replace injured players.
Undoubtedly. But what I want to know is why there isn't a general outcry that Salford are signing players to avoid the drop with complete disregard for the salary cap.

Dave
And now this:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/rugby_l ... 904634.stm

Relegation-threatened Salford have made Warrington winger Richie Barnett their third signing in 24 hours.

Haven't read anything about needing RFL clearance for all these signings...one rule for us and one for the rest?
Do situations like this, confirm that the Salary Cap and entailing controls, are nothing more than a RL device to prevent Wigan from dominating ever again! End of! :(