WiganWarriorsFans.com

He is trying to say that, Lam is better than Johnson, an he wud rather lose Johnson than Lam.
(Which they already have done)
Even thou he has got an injury for 6 months.

But i dont think that they should of let Brisco go. they should of kept him.

Then i dont really no which other player should have gone instead. :conf:

AJ posted:
another 6 months from lam, is better than six years of johnson, its that simple!

were not going to get another 6 months off lam if everything goes well, never mind if he has more problems! and as for faz being out for 4 months he's got a few years ahead of him when he gets back.