Page 2 of 3

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 10:25 am
by jinkin jimmy
IMO what should happen in these situations is that Ganson should blow up, put the incident on report then continue play with a POTB instead of a penalty.

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:01 pm
by medlocke
TWO EYED WARRIOR posted:
Ganson should blow up
Literally i hope !
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:04 pm
by medlocke
Flash posted:
medlocke posted:
loyal posted:
Course we would miss him.

Everybody who played against Bradford, we can't really play without in my opinion. They clearly played one of their best games (as a unit).. and without lockers i think we would lose a great defender and behind the scenes motivator.

And i know what ya all gona say.. It's Barrett that this and Barrett that does that!.

Lockers as also rescued us from many games, and he does do a lot more than fans give him credit for. He may not be the best captain in the world but oh well.. Thats what the name Barretts there for.
Lockers a motivator LMAO, youre haveing a laugh, all the guy does is tackle, his playmaking skills are non exsistant and his kigp are suspect at best, i think you have it the wrong way round, fans actualy give him more credit than he deserves. :sly:
Now, now Medlocke...don't get me started! :wink:
The first time i've called him in months and youre on me like a shot :doz: :wink: :lol: :lol:

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Tue Sep 25, 2007 6:29 pm
by - psycho -
welcome back flash! :D

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:02 am
by Warrior Attack
medlocke posted:
loyal posted:
Course we would miss him.

Everybody who played against Bradford, we can't really play without in my opinion. They clearly played one of their best games (as a unit).. and without lockers i think we would lose a great defender and behind the scenes motivator.

And i know what ya all gona say.. It's Barrett that this and Barrett that does that!.

Lockers as also rescued us from many games, and he does do a lot more than fans give him credit for. He may not be the best captain in the world but oh well.. Thats what the name Barretts there for.
Lockers a motivator LMAO, youre haveing a laugh, all the guy does is tackle, his playmaking skills are non exsistant and his kigp are suspect at best, i think you have it the wrong way round, fans actualy give him more credit than he deserves. :sly:
you iz (no-one wants to know what the rest of this inarticulate rant said - Fraggle), Locky iz da bizniss, he tackles more dan anyone and organizes allova da shop, you iz Gash :exc:

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:28 am
by Fraggle
Warrior Attack posted:
Some meaningless, abusive Ali-G txt spk
Warrior Attack, can I suggest you read the site rules thread in the "Information and FAQ" part of the site before one of us moderators has to start deleting your messages. The previous message here broke two rules - txt spk is not allowed, and insulting other site users is definitely not allowed. Any further abusive messages will be deleted.

This is a site where everyone's views are welcomed, so long as they are respectful to others and not abusive. Please respect that. Thank you.

Fraggle
Site moderator.

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 2:53 pm
by medlocke
Warrior Attack posted:
medlocke posted:
loyal posted:
Course we would miss him.

Everybody who played against Bradford, we can't really play without in my opinion. They clearly played one of their best games (as a unit).. and without lockers i think we would lose a great defender and behind the scenes motivator.

And i know what ya all gona say.. It's Barrett that this and Barrett that does that!.

Lockers as also rescued us from many games, and he does do a lot more than fans give him credit for. He may not be the best captain in the world but oh well.. Thats what the name Barretts there for.
Lockers a motivator LMAO, youre haveing a laugh, all the guy does is tackle, his playmaking skills are non exsistant and his kigp are suspect at best, i think you have it the wrong way round, fans actualy give him more credit than he deserves. :sly:
you iz (no-one wants to know what the rest of this inarticulate rant said - Fraggle), Locky iz da bizniss, he tackles more dan anyone and organizes allova da shop, you iz Gash :exc:
Another RLfans Buffoon, i seem to remember the guy was a tool when i was on there last. Can only guess what you wrote but i probably had a better chance reading swahili init :lol:

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 3:56 pm
by gpartin
medlocke posted:
Warrior Attack posted:
medlocke posted: Lockers a motivator LMAO, youre haveing a laugh, all the guy does is tackle, his playmaking skills are non exsistant and his kigp are suspect at best, i think you have it the wrong way round, fans actualy give him more credit than he deserves. :sly:
you iz (no-one wants to know what the rest of this inarticulate rant said - Fraggle), Locky iz da bizniss, he tackles more dan anyone and organizes allova da shop, you iz Gash :exc:
Another RLfans Buffoon, i seem to remember the guy was a tool when i was on there last. Can only guess what you wrote but i probably had a better chance reading swahili init :lol:
Lol, ting iz doh, datz di only way deez bufoons no.

Seriously, its one of my pet hates - moronic!

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:38 pm
by Wigan Watcher
Lockers: no case to answer

I disagree, I think he has a very big case to answer. He should answer along with many other players at the JJB to all the fans that pay a hell of a lot of money about his lack of ability to go forward and poor tackling technique.

Re: Lockers: no case to an...

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:39 pm
by Panchitta Marra
medlocke posted:
i don't think we would have missed him though
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.