Page 2 of 3
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 9:07 pm
by botica
Most of the tries Pryce has scored, i could have scored!! They were walk ins. Had for instance he been on Charnley's wing, do you think he would have scored them, i doubt it cos he would have had to run.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:13 pm
by GeoffN
ancientnloyal wrote:His games:tries ratio is impressive... name a player with a better ratio?
thats the challenge, with proof since the start of 2010 season.
Josh Charnley is close.
5 from 5 last season, 3 from 3 so far this season.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:17 pm
by Susi
er let me think about that no way jose
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:18 pm
by cpwigan
I was quite impressed how he came back on the inside for his latest try but I haven't watched the full game yet. Remain to be convinced.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:41 pm
by OJ
Give me a nano second to give this my full consideration - right done that - NO
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Mon Mar 14, 2011 10:58 pm
by RJ
I'm sorry, I could have sworn somebody mentioned bringing Pryce back? I can't say I'd really noticed he'd gone.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 8:50 am
by highland convert
The man is boring, no flair, he scores tries. A lot of wingers are not boring have flair and don't score tries. I suppose the second is the best option. :conf:
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 9:24 am
by j658
highland convert wrote:The man is boring, no flair, he scores tries. A lot of wingers are not boring have flair and don't score tries. I suppose the second is the best option. :conf:
Hella confused as to who that is directed at. A current Wigan winger? Don't understand at all. Is it directed at Amos who was outstanding (at full back) before getting injured last year?
For me Pryce is decent from 10 yards out, sound in defence and under the high ball. My problem with him is his lack of impact on kick returns and workrate from our own 20. Both Goulding & Richards are extremely good in these areas, especially Pat who runs it in like a 2nd rower. Charnley & Marsh both impressed me on Sunday with their all round workrate.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:32 am
by BriH
Handy to have him if we are desparate.
Re: Is there a case for bringing Pryce back
Posted: Tue Mar 15, 2011 10:58 am
by dave t
There are a great many fans who dont want Carl back, and I can understand that after seeing his performances in the first team last year.
However, If you look back to those performances, not one of them was in his preferred role of centre ? He either played on the wing or at stand off ?
I watched him last year at centre playing against leeds reserves and he was facing Kallum Watkins,he absolutely murdered him ! he really looked the part at centre and I cant understand why they wont give him a chance there in the first team?
What is the point of the club keeping him for another season if they wont give him a chance in his rightful position? If it were me I would bring him back this week and put him in place of Marsh against Huddersfield