Page 2 of 3

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:59 pm
by First Try Tickle
What would the positives have been if SW had played the full first team and won 70-0.

Nothing, there were loads of positives yesterday, but people won't admit to them because we lost against Widnes.


Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:28 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
If you had £10 on Widnes to win!

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:35 pm
by Forever Warrior
Matty Russell debut. 18 years old and a future star.

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:41 pm
by TrueBlueWarrior
First Try Tickle wrote:What would the positives have been if SW had played the full first team and won 70-0.

Nothing, there were loads of positives yesterday, but people won't admit to them because we lost against Widnes.
The positives would have clearly been 2 points, increased points for and improved points against, top of the league, momentum still gathering, 1-2 players rested that were clearly injured and 1-2 young players introduced to gain experience of Superleague with seasoned team mates, the chance to maybe rest a couple of injured players in the game against Broncos the following week, finally no egg on our face from losing to an awful team in terms of SL standard.

Positives from yesterday? Well hopefully SW has learnt from this clear mistake and we don't lose the league leaders shield by a point.

Re: A Good Note Yesterday Josh

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 6:28 am
by TonyH
I've merged the 'Josh' thread with this one.

Re: A Good Note Yesterday Josh

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:45 am
by First Try Tickle
TonyH wrote:I've merged the 'Josh' thread with this one.
Why ?

They are about 2 different topics.

Better to merge the "positives" thread with the "wigan v widnes" one.

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:43 pm
by GBH
TrueBlueWarrior wrote:
First Try Tickle wrote:What would the positives have been if SW had played the full first team and won 70-0.

Nothing, there were loads of positives yesterday, but people won't admit to them because we lost against Widnes.
The positives would have clearly been 2 points, increased points for and improved points against, top of the league, momentum still gathering, 1-2 players rested that were clearly injured and 1-2 young players introduced to gain experience of Superleague with seasoned team mates, the chance to maybe rest a couple of injured players in the game against Broncos the following week, finally no egg on our face from losing to an awful team in terms of SL standard.

Positives from yesterday? Well hopefully SW has learnt from this clear mistake and we don't lose the league leaders shield by a point.
I could not agree more! spot on!

We play games to win not to learn things, its about winning nothing else! Points in the bag mean everything!

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 1:32 pm
by First Try Tickle
GBH wrote: its about winning nothing else! Points in the bag mean everything!
Tell that to Warrington..

Which do you think they would rather have, the league leaders shield or the grand final trophy.



Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 2:26 pm
by Kittwazzer
First Try Tickle wrote: Tell that to Warrington..

Which do you think they would rather have, the league leaders shield or the grand final trophy.

Why can we not go for both?

Re: Positives from Widnes

Posted: Tue Mar 13, 2012 5:47 pm
by GBH
First Try Tickle wrote:
GBH wrote: its about winning nothing else! Points in the bag mean everything!
Tell that to Warrington..

Which do you think they would rather have, the league leaders shield or the grand final trophy.

All three why aim for anything but a clean sweep?