WiganWarriorsFans.com

Graham could have made Slater's ear less sore if he had smeared it with a a shed load of the vaseline he had on his legs earlier this season. What a plonker

Seems like he is going to plead Not Guilty for a technical reason, whilst he said 'I didn't make a meal of it since there was no salt and pepper available'

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... nrl-charge

Ron Doran wrote:Seems like he is going to plead Not Guilty for a technical reason, whilst he said 'I didn't make a meal of it since there was no salt and pepper available'

http://www.sportinglife.com/rugby-leagu ... nrl-charge

Someone on RedVee claimed Slater had him by the nads and he was just reacting in the only way available!

12 match ban!

haha good

In one of the early games Graham played in, he came on from the bench with his normal half a tub of vaseline on the back of his legs. In the first knock up he had, the tackler took a handfull off, and wiped it all over his face.

He deseves the ban. Nothing worse than biting.

You've got to laugh at Hannibal though.

http://www.smh.com.au/rugby-league/leag ... 272om.html

Kittwazzer wrote:
Someone on RedVee claimed Slater had him by the nads and he was just reacting in the only way available!

Slater couldn't have grabbed his nads if Graham hadn't lumbered 30= metres to get involved in the fight.

Scumbag! The way he attacked Slater was worthy of Ryan Bailey

Yes - I had to laugh at the nads grab defence,(also brought up by the Dogs fans).
I guess Bill must have three arms

I did actually wonder if Slater had got a handful. Not as an excuse to mitigate the biting, but because biting, even for Graham with his petulant streak seemed so over the top.

In any case you can see Slaters hands are up on his upper body, so he didn't.