Page 2 of 3
Re: Westwood
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:59 am
by Kittwazzer
Nezza Faz wrote:Not sure anyway that Hock would gain a work visa for Australia with his previous doping conviction on his record ?
Been covered already. Testing positive and copping a ban does not amount to a criminal conviction!
Re: Westwood
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:58 pm
by Panchitta Marra
Is Gaz Hock strong enough mentally to go to Australia and stay out of his comfort zone which is Wigan Warriors.
I would doubt this very much and I think Gaz knows that too deep down.
Re: Westwood
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:42 pm
by Garry Riley
Just don't get why Westwood would want to come to Wigan. 1 Warringtons squad far more likely to win something. 2 There's going to be nobody left for him to play with here they'll all be in Oz the way its going.
Re: Westwood
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 7:50 pm
by ancientnloyal
Garry Riley wrote:Just don't get why Westwood would want to come to Wigan. 1 Warringtons squad far more likely to win something. 2 There's going to be nobody left for him to play with here they'll all be in Oz the way its going.
He can use Wigan to get to Australia

Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 8:17 am
by Owd Codger
Tomkins, Charnley, Goulding, Thornley, Richards, Green, Smith, Taylor, Mcllorum, Mossop, Hughes, Hansen, O'Loughlin. Subs from Crosby, Dudson, Farrell, Flower, Gelling, Lauraki, Lloyd, Murphy, Powell, Prescott, Spencer, Tomkins, Tuson.
Still looks like a good young 26 man squad to me with others in the pipeline.
Oh ye of little faith.
Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:31 pm
by markill
Whelley Warrior wrote:Tomkins, Charnley, Goulding, Thornley, Richards, Green, Smith, Taylor, Mcllorum, Mossop, Hughes, Hansen, O'Loughlin. Subs from Crosby, Dudson, Farrell, Flower, Gelling, Lauraki, Lloyd, Murphy, Powell, Prescott, Spencer, Tomkins, Tuson.
Still looks like a good young 26 man squad to me with others in the pipeline.
Oh ye of little faith.
9 cup winners, 8 GF winners. I'm sure only Wire have more cup winners and Leeds have more GF winners in their squads (without checking).
Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:51 pm
by jobo
Kittwazzer wrote:Nezza Faz wrote:Not sure anyway that Hock would gain a work visa for Australia with his previous doping conviction on his record ?
Been covered already. Testing positive and copping a ban does not amount to a criminal conviction!
I thought you needed a criminal record just to get into Aus, or am I living in the past.
Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 12:58 pm
by Kittwazzer
jobo wrote:Kittwazzer wrote:Nezza Faz wrote:Not sure anyway that Hock would gain a work visa for Australia with his previous doping conviction on his record ?
Been covered already. Testing positive and copping a ban does not amount to a criminal conviction!
I thought you needed a criminal record just to get into Aus, or am I living in the past.
Don't know if its still the case but Australia's Immigration Policy used to be blatantly racist. No Blacks. No Asians. The would allow olive skinned latinos from Spain, Italy, Greece etc as they were suited to work in the mediterranean climate of Queensland and the like!
Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 4:11 pm
by platt-warrior
Australia has an extreemly large Asian population.
Re: Westwood
Posted: Wed Oct 31, 2012 6:16 pm
by Kittwazzer
platt-warrior wrote:Australia has an extreemly large Asian population.
Just looked into it and it would appear to have been relaxed since I was at school but White Australian Policy was vigourously enforced from its introduction in 1901 to the latter half of the 20th century. Bottom line is Australia does not want an influx of blacks. Hell, it doesn't particularly want its own indigenous black population!