Hughes gven 4 but Thornley given 17 is to me an indication that they will both get a go pre-season / early season to stake a claim, but as Jack has been playing first team lots last year it makes more sense to put him as the 1-13 number based on the criteria SW indicated.
Tuson 16 is a shock to me. I wasn't especially impressed with him last season. I would have had Dudson or Prescott in that shirt probably.
Squad Numbers - 2013
Re: Squad Numbers - 2013
in the world of mules, there are no rules
LATEST PODCAST EPISODE
https://www.spreaker.com/user/superleaguepod
LATEST PODCAST EPISODE
https://www.spreaker.com/user/superleaguepod
Re: Squad Numbers - 2013
Where are the rest of the squad numbers there are a few names missing here Murphy, Burke, Carberry, Greenwood, Farrell etc ???
"If there is no blood on the line, it is not rugby league"
(Russell Crowe)
(Russell Crowe)
-
- Posts: 2526
- Joined: Fri Jul 14, 2006 3:44 pm
Re: Squad Numbers - 2013
If he picks by performance numbers are irrelevant. Play for places. Given he has given the boys the starting numbers they have to perform. Hock, Gelling, Thornley and Tucson will all be out to prove a point. It's a motivator.