WiganWarriorsFans.com

Wigan Watcher wrote:

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:

Wigan Watcher wrote:Got to go for Warrington considering we were so poor against a tired and injury hit Leeds. Our forwards let us down in that game along with no skill shown by our backs equals a Warrington win but it could go close as its a final. We will go off the boil 60 mins in to the game and that's were it will be won in my humble opinion.

Your negativity is becoming quite irritating!!

I ignore silly comments

Silly according to you, but what I find more silly is that you are negative about our performance in a semi-final against a team that has only lost 1 in the last 6 years. We win very comfortably scoring 4 very good tries (according to you we showed no skill in our backs) and defended exceptionally well the whole game (again according to you our forwards let us down)!! A tired, injury hit Leeds, who didn't play for them? Who didn't play for us? Have Leeds not won the GF before without having a week off? Yes they have!! Also you state that we will go off the boil at 60 minutes and that is where the game will be won, wow that is a big prediction!!

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:
Silly according to you, but what I find more silly is that you are negative about our performance in a semi-final against a team that has only lost 1 in the last 6 years.

Correct, and who was that 'one' they lost to!!!

Leeds were the equivalent of us in our Wembley run, or certainly the nearest thing. We have done a Salford on them!

Kittwazzer wrote:

TrueBlueWarrior wrote:
Silly according to you, but what I find more silly is that you are negative about our performance in a semi-final against a team that has only lost 1 in the last 6 years.

Correct, and who was that 'one' they lost to!!!

Leeds were the equivalent of us in our Wembley run, or certainly the nearest thing. We have done a Salford on them!

Hardly "a Salford" but I understand your point.

The fact remains, no matter how "weak" Leeds were or how "poor our forwards" or "none skilled" our backs, and despite the bookies making Leeds favourites going to the home of Wigan Warriors, that side beat those odds and the record book to deny Leeds a record-breaking third consecutive title. Yeah I can see also were WW comes from, we were crap!

Everybody is entitled to their opinion surely? and without negative retorts?

I'd say Warrington are favourites also our form against them says so and if they play to their potential and we are not upto it they'd win. Plus, Briers will be on a mission

cpwigan wrote:Everybody is entitled to their opinion surely? and without negative retorts?

If you disagree with an opinion of someone that is constantly negative even when facts contradict their opinion then surely a negative retort is acceptable.

No it isn't. Please comment on the content of the posts, not on the posters themselves. Your first reply breaches this, your second gave a reasoned argument why you think the poster was wrong.

Everyone, by that I mean all the pundits, seems to be tipping Warrington. Interestingly, the Sainta chairman is the only one I have heard who thinks Wigan will win. I know that the coaches and players have been motivated by such negativity all season, let battle commence.

How on Earth can me saying that a posters negativity is becoming irritating be about anything other than his/her posts? I don't know him/her, never met them, for all I know it could be Mr Tumble who exudes positivity. Clearly my OP was aimed at their posts regarding their negativity about Wigan Warriors and not a personal insult. I find my 'warning' (which came very quickly after a post from CP) from a Mod quite insulting, especially after some of the posts I have read in the past that will have gone completely unnoticed, hmmmmmmm I wonder why?

The whole site is on a warning for this type of thing. The mods are sensitive to it.

Comment only on the contents of the post, not on the motivations or attitude of the poster.