James Graham Omission

Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill.
cow yeds
Posts: 1149
Joined: Tue Feb 23, 2010 10:42 am

Re: James Graham Omission

Post by cow yeds »

ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class
thegimble
Posts: 5970
Joined: Tue Feb 08, 2005 10:09 am

Re: James Graham Omission

Post by thegimble »

cow yeds wrote:
ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class
Hock if he had applied himself as a true professional does Hock would be regarded as the best forward in the world. Problem is he has not and even with his limited application he is still one of the better forwards in Super League.

If he had looked after himself he would today be the most dangerous forward in the game. He has more ability than Slater or Tomkins but he does not care about the game as much as they do.

Its one thing to have the ability its another thing doing something with it.

Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: James Graham Omission

Post by Kittwazzer »

thegimble wrote:
cow yeds wrote:
ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class
Hock if he had applied himself as a true professional does Hock would be regarded as the best forward in the world. Problem is he has not and even with his limited application he is still one of the better forwards in Super League.

If he had looked after himself he would today be the most dangerous forward in the game. He has more ability than Slater or Tomkins but he does not care about the game as much as they do.

Its one thing to have the ability its another thing doing something with it.
Not sure I'd go that far but you raise a good point. He is reminiscent of the highly talented 14/15 year old who's coach tries his damnedest to stay focused on the game at an age when lads are at their most susceptible to 'distractions'
morley pie eater
Posts: 3579
Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 2:01 pm

Re: James Graham Omission

Post by morley pie eater »

gillysmyhero wrote:
Sorry but I don't believe Graham would take on Gaz at all, if he did he'd have bitten off more than he could chew.

:o

I'll get my coat.
But does he have the right pedigree, like Joel Monaghan for instance?
Wigan ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Saints ⭐⭐⭐
Kittwazzer
Posts: 11308
Joined: Wed Jul 30, 2008 12:31 pm

Re: James Graham Omission

Post by Kittwazzer »

Here's an Aussie take on the matter:

http://m.foxsports.com.au/league/englan ... 6751565078
Post Reply