Page 2 of 2

Re: James Graham Omission

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 6:58 pm
by cow yeds
ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class

Re: James Graham Omission

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 7:04 pm
by thegimble
cow yeds wrote:
ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class
Hock if he had applied himself as a true professional does Hock would be regarded as the best forward in the world. Problem is he has not and even with his limited application he is still one of the better forwards in Super League.

If he had looked after himself he would today be the most dangerous forward in the game. He has more ability than Slater or Tomkins but he does not care about the game as much as they do.

Its one thing to have the ability its another thing doing something with it.


Re: James Graham Omission

Posted: Wed Oct 30, 2013 8:08 pm
by Kittwazzer
thegimble wrote:
cow yeds wrote:
ddtftf wrote:Could have been another Sonny Bill Williams its so sad he has demons
Now you are talking daft, Hock not in the same class
Hock if he had applied himself as a true professional does Hock would be regarded as the best forward in the world. Problem is he has not and even with his limited application he is still one of the better forwards in Super League.

If he had looked after himself he would today be the most dangerous forward in the game. He has more ability than Slater or Tomkins but he does not care about the game as much as they do.

Its one thing to have the ability its another thing doing something with it.
Not sure I'd go that far but you raise a good point. He is reminiscent of the highly talented 14/15 year old who's coach tries his damnedest to stay focused on the game at an age when lads are at their most susceptible to 'distractions'

Re: James Graham Omission

Posted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 1:59 pm
by morley pie eater
gillysmyhero wrote:
Sorry but I don't believe Graham would take on Gaz at all, if he did he'd have bitten off more than he could chew.

:o

I'll get my coat.
But does he have the right pedigree, like Joel Monaghan for instance?

Re: James Graham Omission

Posted: Sat Nov 02, 2013 12:34 pm
by Kittwazzer
Here's an Aussie take on the matter:

http://m.foxsports.com.au/league/englan ... 6751565078