WiganWarriorsFans.com

jobo wrote:

Whelley Warrior wrote:

Whelley Warrior wrote:I can remember the days when we had proper Labour MP's who had worked for a living.

Not the career politicians we have now straight from University and don't know what a day's work means.

Only Dennis Skinner left!

Dennis Skinner "Half of the tory members opposite are crooks"
Speaker "Withdraw that remark"
Dennis Skinner "OK, half of the tory members opposite aren't crooks"

Dennis Skinner...The Beast of Bolsover.

the winky one wrote:

jobo wrote:

Whelley Warrior wrote: Only Dennis Skinner left!

Dennis Skinner "Half of the tory members opposite are crooks"
Speaker "Withdraw that remark"
Dennis Skinner "OK, half of the tory members opposite aren't crooks"

Dennis Skinner...The Beast of Bolsover.

Ex miner I believe. Travelled around his constituency on a bicycle and drew a Parliamentary wage commensurate with the average earnings of his constituents. Now we have MPs claiming expenses for their moats and duck houses.

Oh for the good old days of seedy brothels and rent boys!

[/quote]

Ex miner I believe. Travelled around his constituency on a bicycle and drew a Parliamentary wage commensurate with the average earnings of his constituents. Now we have MPs claiming expenses for their moats and duck houses.

Oh for the good old days of seedy brothels and rent boys![/quote]

They are still there,dont you worry.

Lets not forget the £1,000,000 'improvements' to Kensington Palace to make it fit for the new Prince George to live in, how many rooms in that place, wonder if they pay 'bedroom tax' ?

i fear for my grandchildren who have to grow up on this bloody god forsaken island being taken over by economic migrants, no hopers and lazy home grown barstewards

In other news, scientists have discovered that there is a place on earth capable of achieving the temperature of absolute zero.
Apparently it's in George Osbourne's heart.

I don't want to spoil the fun here, and it may be a fact that MP's are lazy good for nothing, expense fiddling scroungers; but the MP's don't actually get a say in what they get paid, and they didn't opt for a pay rise.

MP's salaries are sent by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority which was created in the wake of the expenses scandal. They were given the job of setting pay, amongst other things, to avoid any chance of impropriety.

The MP's are mostly on board with not actually wanting the pay rise at all, and Cameron is so annoyed by it that he's threatened to disband the authority completely. Let's give a bit of credit where it is due

i'm spartacus wrote:I don't want to spoil the fun here, and it may be a fact that MP's are lazy good for nothing, expense fiddling scroungers; but the MP's don't actually get a say in what they get paid, and they didn't opt for a pay rise.

MP's salaries are sent by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority which was created in the wake of the expenses scandal. They were given the job of setting pay, amongst other things, to avoid any chance of impropriety.

The MP's are mostly on board with not actually wanting the pay rise at all, and Cameron is so annoyed by it that he's threatened to disband the authority completely. Let's give a bit of credit where it is due

Not strictly true Spartacus. The majority of MPs in all parties are / were in favour of a pay rise and the average figure each parties MPs believed they should get was higher in the Conservative Party, then the Lib Dems, then the Labour Party. ALL were even higher than the 11% which IMO is clearly an unrealistic figure and begs the question how did they arrive at such a ludicrous figure.

cpwigan wrote:

i'm spartacus wrote:I don't want to spoil the fun here, and it may be a fact that MP's are lazy good for nothing, expense fiddling scroungers; but the MP's don't actually get a say in what they get paid, and they didn't opt for a pay rise.

MP's salaries are sent by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority which was created in the wake of the expenses scandal. They were given the job of setting pay, amongst other things, to avoid any chance of impropriety.

The MP's are mostly on board with not actually wanting the pay rise at all, and Cameron is so annoyed by it that he's threatened to disband the authority completely. Let's give a bit of credit where it is due

Not strictly true Spartacus. The majority of MPs in all parties are / were in favour of a pay rise and the average figure each parties MPs believed they should get was higher in the Conservative Party, then the Lib Dems, then the Labour Party. ALL were even higher than the 11% which IMO is clearly an unrealistic figure and begs the question how did they arrive at such a ludicrous figure.

And members of the so called Independent Parliamentary Panel are?

Whelley Warrior wrote:

cpwigan wrote:

i'm spartacus wrote:I don't want to spoil the fun here, and it may be a fact that MP's are lazy good for nothing, expense fiddling scroungers; but the MP's don't actually get a say in what they get paid, and they didn't opt for a pay rise.

MP's salaries are sent by the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority which was created in the wake of the expenses scandal. They were given the job of setting pay, amongst other things, to avoid any chance of impropriety.

The MP's are mostly on board with not actually wanting the pay rise at all, and Cameron is so annoyed by it that he's threatened to disband the authority completely. Let's give a bit of credit where it is due

Not strictly true Spartacus. The majority of MPs in all parties are / were in favour of a pay rise and the average figure each parties MPs believed they should get was higher in the Conservative Party, then the Lib Dems, then the Labour Party. ALL were even higher than the 11% which IMO is clearly an unrealistic figure and begs the question how did they arrive at such a ludicrous figure.

And members of the so called Independent Parliamentary Panel are?

Non of them are MP's, so your point is?