Micky mac
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Micky mac
Lets hope the is not sight threatening and he can play as I am sure he would want to.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.
Re: Micky mac
He'll be targeted anyway, I don't think Micky would want it any other way. Micky & John Bateman just get better when things get rough lolPanchitta Marra wrote:Lets hope the is not sight threatening and he can play as I am sure he would want to.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.
Re: Micky mac
Players can wear those protective masks and headguards.
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Micky mac
I was thinking exactly the same, lets just hope a medical decision doesnt prevent him playing.cpwigan wrote:Players can wear those protective masks and headguards.
- WESTCUMBRIARIVERSIDER
- Posts: 370
- Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2005 7:57 pm
Re: Micky mac
thats my only concern, like that shithouse LMS or Masoe going right for him and winding him up with a smack to the eye, soliola as wellKaii wrote:He'll be targeted anyway, I don't think Micky would want it any other way. Micky & John Bateman just get better when things get rough lolPanchitta Marra wrote:Lets hope the is not sight threatening and he can play as I am sure he would want to.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.
Re: Micky mac
That was my worry and even more so after seeing one of the Bulldogs players deliberately trying to get at Sam Burgess yesterday when it was clear James Graham had done something similar to his cheekbone.Panchitta Marra wrote:Lets hope the is not sight threatening and he can play as I am sure he would want to.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.
Much as I want Micky Mac to play if there is any prospect of him doing any damage to himself and especially his eyes then I couldn't condone his selection, it would simply wrong.
Never argue with an idiot. He will bring you down to his level and beat you with experience.
-
- Posts: 190
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 3:45 pm
Re: Micky mac
Sam Burgess played the full 80 minutes yesterday with a similar injury. Accidental clash of heads with James Graham. 1st tackle of the game after 6 seconds. Mickey Mac is a tough lad. He'll want to play no doubt about that. I think we have a better edge about us when he's on the pitch.
Re: Micky mac
If there's any danger of serious injury (such as potential loss of sight in that eye), then he wouldn't play.
But other than that, i can't see him missing the final. Roby will be praying he has to sit out.
But other than that, i can't see him missing the final. Roby will be praying he has to sit out.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
Re: Micky mac
Not sure about this but there is a real problem in Union over duty of care regarding clubs relationship with players/injuries and predatory lawyers after compensation over duty of care.There is talk of size limitations by player position to attempt to limit the damage and consequential financial penalties.Presumably Wigan have their own lawyers advising on this?
mp
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Micky mac
Masoe will be like a bull at a gate and wound up to do damage. A big lump of a bloke difficult to handle when he's off on one. Our big lads will just have to keep him wrapped up.WESTCUMBRIARIVERSIDER wrote:thats my only concern, like that shithouse LMS or Masoe going right for him and winding him up with a smack to the eye, soliola as wellKaii wrote:He'll be targeted anyway, I don't think Micky would want it any other way. Micky & John Bateman just get better when things get rough lolPanchitta Marra wrote:Lets hope the is not sight threatening and he can play as I am sure he would want to.
If he does play, I'm sure he'll be targeted though which is a concern on interchanges.