I am not sure. If Wigan don't want him back I can't see the club asking for a fee anyway. Be a bit hypocritical given as soon as someone wants to go the NRL they won't stand in their way but they then ask for a fee for a player surplus to requirements.josie andrews wrote:
Didn't he sign a five year contract? I'm sure he should still have two years left or at the very least one :conf:
I agree. We have Rocky playing full back no doubt for the same sort of reason.The biggest mistake they made with Jack was after his very good first season in the second row, he was moved to the centre position after George Carmont left.
He told me he couldn't play centre & he didn't particularly want to play there but he was in the team which is what he wanted.
Ironically he got a game or two at centre before he went on loan and looked more capable than two I could mention!After that season where he didn't impress, people called him lazy IIRC, he lost his place in the second row. When he did play, he didn't seem to play as well. Maybe because he wasn't playing regularly enough to get back his previous good form.
He's just another player employed for what he was good at who is being asked to do something he isn't good at.I know I wasn't best pleased with the swap deal for Larne Patrick. I don't think he has accomplished what was expected of him IMO
He hasn't impressed me![]()
Lauaki, Pettyborne, Tauati, Patrick, Hampshire, Joel and Hughes all played out of position or asked to play a different game compared to why we signed them (for those we signed).