Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Got something to discuss about RL in general? Then this is the place to post it.
pedro
Posts: 5294
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by pedro »

all game he murdered Saints, not a great fan of theirs but was laughable.
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by cpwigan »

mickw wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Robbed. Scored a try not given. Knock on given as a try against. The RFL is not fit for purpose.
Stop blaming referees
:lol: Quite right Mick and ordinarily you know me but this was a shocker.

mikey
Posts: 166
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 4:06 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by mikey »

no complaints from Wilkin so it must have been good a linesman calls it short Thaler gives no try video ref can't see any evidence to change decision defiantly no try
fozzieskem
Posts: 6494
Joined: Sat May 14, 2016 10:54 am

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by fozzieskem »

I always thought Thaler was the best of them but something went wrong tonight
shaunedwardsfanclub
Posts: 6338
Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by shaunedwardsfanclub »

The touch judge gave Linehham's try and he gave the VR the opportunity to overrule his decision regarding Peyrouxs effort.

It can be argued that Saints were hard done to but the best team won.
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
User avatar
yokozuna
Posts: 1762
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2004 10:15 am

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by yokozuna »

The first video ref decision for the Gidley try was strange. They checked the obstruction, but didn't roll the video on to a successful grounding over the line. They stopped the replay with Gidley grounding the ball short of the line, and when I saw it at the time and in replays, you don't see the ball grounded over the line.

I don't think it was.

I've never seen a video ref decision like that not look at the grounding if the try is going to be given.
Footballers spend 90 minutes pretending they're injured. Rugby League players spend 80 minutes pretending they're not.
The booze hound
Posts: 817
Joined: Tue Feb 25, 2014 8:05 am

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by The booze hound »

OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.
josie andrews
Posts: 36240
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
Location: Wigan
Contact:

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by josie andrews »

The booze hound wrote:
OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
jobo
Posts: 3694
Joined: Sun Oct 27, 2002 1:33 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by jobo »

The booze hound wrote:
OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.
Why should Ratchford have to downplay the effect on him of a high tackle? Can't see how this is play acting.
The offense was committed and Ratchford made sure the ref was aware.
F
This seems fair enough to me.
pedro
Posts: 5294
Joined: Thu Jul 08, 2004 9:37 pm

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Post by pedro »

wasnt high, arm was over the shoulder, 90% of tackles are made with a similar motion.
Post Reply