Page 2 of 3

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:43 pm
by pedro
all game he murdered Saints, not a great fan of theirs but was laughable.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Thu Sep 29, 2016 11:52 pm
by cpwigan
mickw wrote:
cpwigan wrote:Robbed. Scored a try not given. Knock on given as a try against. The RFL is not fit for purpose.
Stop blaming referees
:lol: Quite right Mick and ordinarily you know me but this was a shocker.


Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:50 am
by mikey
no complaints from Wilkin so it must have been good a linesman calls it short Thaler gives no try video ref can't see any evidence to change decision defiantly no try

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 12:54 am
by fozzieskem
I always thought Thaler was the best of them but something went wrong tonight

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 1:58 am
by shaunedwardsfanclub
The touch judge gave Linehham's try and he gave the VR the opportunity to overrule his decision regarding Peyrouxs effort.

It can be argued that Saints were hard done to but the best team won.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:22 am
by yokozuna
The first video ref decision for the Gidley try was strange. They checked the obstruction, but didn't roll the video on to a successful grounding over the line. They stopped the replay with Gidley grounding the ball short of the line, and when I saw it at the time and in replays, you don't see the ball grounded over the line.

I don't think it was.

I've never seen a video ref decision like that not look at the grounding if the try is going to be given.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 8:27 am
by The booze hound
OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 9:03 am
by josie andrews
The booze hound wrote:
OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:13 am
by jobo
The booze hound wrote:
OJ wrote:On top of all that Daryl Clarke should get an academy award for his acting - last 3 wire games I've seen he's been a real conman and doesn't need to be as he's a decent enough player without the continual attempts to get penalties
Ratchford is murder for this too. When he spilled the ball in a tackle by Percival a scrum was awarded to Saints. Ratchford stayed down holding his head long enough for the VR to intervene (which apparently they can do when the game is stopped) and award a penalty to Wire for a high tackle, which was, if at all, the slightest of high tackles whatsoever.
As soon as the penalty was awarded Ratchford jumped up with a miracle of a recovery.
Saints lose an attacking scrum in Wires 20, Wire are piggy backed up to Saints 40.
Some people will call this clever or gamesmanship by Ratchford, but this is not the Rugby League I grew up with or how I believe it should be played.
Why should Ratchford have to downplay the effect on him of a high tackle? Can't see how this is play acting.
The offense was committed and Ratchford made sure the ref was aware.
F
This seems fair enough to me.

Re: Wire v Saints refereeing decisions!

Posted: Fri Sep 30, 2016 10:19 am
by pedro
wasnt high, arm was over the shoulder, 90% of tackles are made with a similar motion.