Page 2 of 2

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 3:08 pm
by Kittwazzer
Wigan Watcher wrote:Two very bad teams with not much attacking flair... Wait till Smith comes back for the snakes... He will make a
difference..NOT
He'll be a big improvement on Wilkin. Christ, my Aunty Elsie would be an improvement on Wilkin!

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 4:09 pm
by bill.inger
i think I know your Auntie Elsie and you're right, she is a better player than Wilkin and she makes better coffee.

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 7:30 pm
by morley pie eater
Wasn't Elsie the one with the curlers and headscarf? If so, she and her agent were seen talking to McM-anus today . . . Sorry Josie, should be on Rumour Mill.

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:37 pm
by cow yeds
Gotta admit the last two minutes of the game was exciting.

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 9:41 am
by TrueBlueWarrior
cow yeds wrote:Gotta admit the last two minutes of the game was exciting.
Not if you are a Stains fan!! :lol: :lol: :lol:

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Mon Mar 13, 2017 12:33 pm
by yokozuna
Have they managed to find the ball after Wilkin's grubber kick at the end?

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 10:18 am
by sheepdip
Saints cannot call themselves "The Entertainers" anymore. That's false advertising.

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:10 pm
by moto748
sheepdip wrote:Saints cannot call themselves "The Entertainers" anymore. That's false advertising.
I only found out the other day that, in the NRL, the Bulldogs are known as "The Entertainers"! :lol:

Considering that they are officially the second most boring team in the comp (after Madge's boys, of course), I find that pretty laughable too.

Re: Hull v Saints

Posted: Tue Mar 14, 2017 1:42 pm
by yokozuna
Wilkin's grubber kick entertained me!