Page 2 of 2
Re: Ferris
Posted: Wed Apr 05, 2017 10:51 pm
by markill
thegimble wrote:
Do SL still have the rule is the appeal is baseless and a waste of time they can increase the games banned.
I think they can decide to increase it whether they think the appeal a waste of time or not. It'll cost him another £200 or £300 quid probably at the least too.
Re: Ferris
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:06 am
by Wormburner
Can't believe people are moaning because he is appealing, those are the rules, i notice it's a different crack when it is one of our own players :eusa4:
Re: Ferris
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 12:53 am
by pedro
seems fair 6 matches, hope he appeals and gets 8 as 6 is fair.
Re: Ferris
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 9:05 am
by Wormburner
pedro wrote:seems fair 6 matches, hope he appeals and gets 8 as 6 is fair.
and if that happens then fair enough
Re: Ferris
Posted: Thu Apr 06, 2017 1:55 pm
by OAMJSONA
bring back hanging i say
Re: Ferris
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 8:28 am
by phild1
Ferris has fit in well at leeds,i would class him as a sneaky dirty player and not one of the games hard men.
Re: Ferris
Posted: Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:30 pm
by TheDevil666
Ferris is a scummy individual. He was unable to keep his John Thomas in his trousers at his last club and did the dirty on his best friend and team mate. Nobody can ever prove it was deliberate but nobody can neither prove otherwise. Personally, I do not think he deliberately set out to injure Gildart but he knew fully what 'tackle' he was executing and intended to hurt Gildart. 6 matches was pathetic. 6 or 12 months maybe.