Page 2 of 2
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:11 am
by Charriots Offiah
widdenoldboy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:20 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:05 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 9:42 pm
Not sure about the sin binning tbh
I agree with the decision Fozzie, you can no longer lead with the shoulder and if it makes contact with your opponents head you are in big trouble.
The same player got away with two similar shots on Byrne last week - such are the margins !
It’s just inconsistent refereeing, the same happened in the Castleford and Hull game.
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 7:37 am
by Firestarter
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:11 am
widdenoldboy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:20 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:05 pm
I agree with the decision Fozzie, you can no longer lead with the shoulder and if it makes contact with your opponents head you are in big trouble.
The same player got away with two similar shots on Byrne last week - such are the margins !
It’s just inconsistent refereeing, the same happened in the Castleford and Hull game.
I thought two leeds tries were forward passes
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 7:43 am
by josie andrews
Firestarter wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 7:37 am
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 2:11 am
widdenoldboy wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 12:20 am
The same player got away with two similar shots on Byrne last week - such are the margins !
It’s just inconsistent refereeing, the same happened in the Castleford and Hull game.
I thought two leeds tries were forward passes
That’s what Burgess says too!
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 9:02 am
by Ipinwigan
Yet again another soft Video Ref decision for the sin bin, which in the end changed the game with w***y w***y Warrington winning, when the were second best for most of the game.
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 3:33 pm
by fozzie58
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:05 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 9:42 pm
Not sure about the sin binning tbh
I agree with the decision Fozzie, you can no longer lead with the shoulder and if it makes contact with your opponents head you are in big trouble.
When sky showed it again (and again)you’re right it was correct less with the shoulder and well that’s what you get I suppose.
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 4:26 pm
by Charriots Offiah
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 3:33 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:05 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 9:42 pm
Not sure about the sin binning tbh
I agree with the decision Fozzie, you can no longer lead with the shoulder and if it makes contact with your opponents head you are in big trouble.
When sky showed it again (and again)you’re right it was correct less with the shoulder and well that’s what you get I suppose.
I don’t agree with it but that is the standard now.
Re: Wire v Loiners
Posted: Sat Mar 29, 2025 4:43 pm
by fozzie58
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 4:26 pm
fozzie58 wrote: ↑Sat Mar 29, 2025 3:33 pm
Charriots Offiah wrote: ↑Fri Mar 28, 2025 11:05 pm
I agree with the decision Fozzie, you can no longer lead with the shoulder and if it makes contact with your opponents head you are in big trouble.
When sky showed it again (and again)you’re right it was correct less with the shoulder and well that’s what you get I suppose.
I don’t agree with it but that is the standard now.
So long as it’s a rule that’s consistent then we really can’t complain but is it consistently applied I suppose is the bigger question