Re: 20 man squad
Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2006 2:21 am
Millward is adamant Rads wont play this week, I would tend to agree with that train of thought. I do hope I'm wrong though.
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
nathan_rugby posted:
Chris ashton at full back is for definate. You cannot have a player who hasnt played a full game since september, returing to a match and running the ball out every set, sprinting across pitch to defend and he isnt the fastest. We need ashton at full back who has been very reliable and never giving up in defence.
1-ashton
2-dallas
3-richards
4-radlinski
5-calderwood
6-orr
7-dobbson
8-feka
9-higham
10-logan
11-hock
12-fletcher
13-lockers
14-seu seu
15-godwin
16- dont care
17- dont care
very strong lineup
And Ive highlighted the areas of weekness!Doveoverdave posted:nathan_rugby posted:
Chris ashton at full back is for definate. You cannot have a player who hasnt played a full game since september, returing to a match and running the ball out every set, sprinting across pitch to defend and he isnt the fastest. We need ashton at full back who has been very reliable and never giving up in defence.
1-ashton
2-dallas
3-richards
4-radlinski
5-calderwood
6-orr
7-dobbson
8-feka
9-higham
10-logan
11-hock
12-fletcher
13-lockers
14-seu seu
15-godwin
16- dont care
17- dont care
very strong lineup![]()
![]()
I'll just highlight the weak areas as I see them.
Dallas -finished, Richards in the centre?Same for Rads and just out of his slippers, Calderwood first game back, Orr enough said, Dobson, the jury is still out, 10 minutes a half Feka, Seu SEu, finished and the 2 don't care are just frighteninmg assessments of our playing strength.
Still think it's a very strong line up?
I disgree slightly. I for one am willing to give the Don't Care brothers time to settle in!!Wigan Watcher posted:And Ive highlighted the areas of weekness!Doveoverdave posted:nathan_rugby posted:
Chris ashton at full back is for definate. You cannot have a player who hasnt played a full game since september, returing to a match and running the ball out every set, sprinting across pitch to defend and he isnt the fastest. We need ashton at full back who has been very reliable and never giving up in defence.
1-ashton
2-dallas
3-richards
4-radlinski
5-calderwood
6-orr
7-dobbson
8-feka
9-higham
10-logan
11-hock
12-fletcher
13-lockers
14-seu seu
15-godwin
16- dont care
17- dont care
very strong lineup![]()
![]()
I'll just highlight the weak areas as I see them.
Dallas -finished, Richards in the centre?Same for Rads and just out of his slippers, Calderwood first game back, Orr enough said, Dobson, the jury is still out, 10 minutes a half Feka, Seu SEu, finished and the 2 don't care are just frighteninmg assessments of our playing strength.
Still think it's a very strong line up?
So if we can find another 14 players then we will stop up.
Does "Dont care" even mean Kevin Brown?!nathan_rugby posted:
Chris ashton at full back is for definate. You cannot have a player who hasnt played a full game since september, returing to a match and running the ball out every set, sprinting across pitch to defend and he isnt the fastest. We need ashton at full back who has been very reliable and never giving up in defence.
1-ashton
2-dallas
3-richards
4-radlinski
5-calderwood
6-orr
7-dobbson
8-feka
9-higham
10-logan
11-hock
12-fletcher
13-lockers
14-seu seu
15-godwin
16- dont care
17- dont care
very strong lineup
According to the official site:Martin WWRFL posted:
Radlinski will be on the bench and when he comes on noble said he'll get a standing ovassion (dont no if thats spelt right) but he must produce the goods.