Re: We must get wagga sign...
Posted: Sat Jul 15, 2006 11:30 pm
mickey's from leigh , how could he possibly have brains.thats one step above a plastic scousser and one below plant life

A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
If ChrisA is for Higham then I am for Godwin since ChrisA is now the only one who thinks TAP was a good coach.ChrisA posted:
I've said all season and last season that Godwin is sharp around the ruck area, but he doesn't seem to have the vision to go with it, he makes plenty of breaks, but he doesn't look for the support like many of the better hookers in the league do. Godwin is a good players who gives 100%, Higham is a class above and also gives 100%. His vision and creativity is of a much higher standard then Godwin's, Godwins breaks and half breaks seem to set up good field position or give the forwards a breather, if Higham makes a break players support him and he is always looking for support, I feel far more confident that something will happen from a break if it's Higham rather than Godwin who makes it.
I still think he is a good coach, he did a superb job at Leigh, and a superb job at Saints. It didn't work ou for him or Wigan in his time with us, but we could say the same for plenty of other coaches also couldn't we. Bitterness is a terrible thing Ian, just ask your family, I'm sure they loved you stopping them going watching their club because you dislike the coach.ian.birchall posted:If ChrisA is for Higham then I am for Godwin since ChrisA is now the only one who thinks TAP was a good coach.ChrisA posted:
I've said all season and last season that Godwin is sharp around the ruck area, but he doesn't seem to have the vision to go with it, he makes plenty of breaks, but he doesn't look for the support like many of the better hookers in the league do. Godwin is a good players who gives 100%, Higham is a class above and also gives 100%. His vision and creativity is of a much higher standard then Godwin's, Godwins breaks and half breaks seem to set up good field position or give the forwards a breather, if Higham makes a break players support him and he is always looking for support, I feel far more confident that something will happen from a break if it's Higham rather than Godwin who makes it.
Whilst we are on the subject, if we are going to give the players stupid cricket type/public school monickers (and heaven forbid) then surely Godwin should be Godders not Waggas![]()
Edit note, having read that posting the renaming of Godwin also eliminates any sexual connotation on this family noticeboard![]()
Agreed, if Cunningham, Higham, Newton and Alker aren't fit.chrisJJ posted:
WAGGA for GB!!!
I would keep waga because newton and higham are almost the same in how they play, and waga is always making breaks.mike binder posted:
forget terry newton great player but a past player ,now we look like we will be playing sl next year i think it time to open contract deals with him.Him and michael higham work great together ,we all know that our coach is another lover of the two hooker system so if this is the case he as to get this great young hooker signed now especially as mccurum from the u 21s is injured as well![]()