Page 2 of 2
Re: Phil Clarke
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 5:54 pm
by mike binder
pieater-alex posted:
NTA1 posted:
Does anyone else think that Phil Clarke just gets better and better on sky each week?
I highly dislike phil clarke.
He would be nothing without wigan.
All he can do nower days is slag wigan off and praise saints.
Defo not a true pieater
think since some 1 told him that ,and he said he was trying to be unbiased but had gone the opposite way hes changed to be more warriors than st

:conf:
Re: Phil Clarke
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 6:19 pm
by El Rifle
Not into phil clarke at all, as a presenter he's got nothing he's clumsy with his words and waffles at the wrong time in games. He has these prepared 'anecdotes' that he spins off during the games and he's very petty in his arguing. He's like a farmer at a tea party
Re: Phil Clarke
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 8:43 pm
by jinkin jimmy
El Rifle posted:
Not into phil clarke at all, as a presenter he's got nothing he's clumsy with his words and waffles at the wrong time in games. He has these prepared 'anecdotes' that he spins off during the games and he's very petty in his arguing. He's like a farmer at a tea party
:eh:
Re: Phil Clarke
Posted: Sun Aug 13, 2006 9:05 pm
by chrisJJ
pieater-alex posted:
I highly dislike phil clarke.
He would be nothing without wigan.
All he can do nower days is slag wigan off and praise saints.
Defo not a true pieater
nearly every week Phil Clarke comments on how good Wigan are doing and tells his story about his dad saying they can get in to the play-offs.
You have to praise St Helens they are a good few wins ahead of anyone at the top and deserve to be!! they've had a great season, and wigan... well they've had a poor one. So what's your point??