Page 2 of 3
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:27 pm
by cpwigan
Nobody from cas is worth a spot in our team. I cannot see many of them getting SL starts next year with anybody bar platt and we have a better fullback.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 9:28 pm
by Cruncher
Personally, I think Scully's already had his chance at Wigan. Noble, I suspect, prefers 'old school' props: i.e. big, strong guys who drive the ball up hard and put in a shed-load of tackles.
For me, DS is too lethargic. He wasn't half as involved tonight as he should have been. So he's one that I definitely don't expect to be at the JJB when next season starts.
Re: Should wigan sign any cas ...
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 10:10 pm
by old hooker
Manu is a good forward and i would love to see him at Wigan. Platt very impressive but with Withers and Ashton we dont need him
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:36 pm
by thegimble
No.
None of the Wakey or Cas players are good enough and if they were theyd be snapped up by now.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sat Sep 16, 2006 11:43 pm
by wigan_twins
thegimble posted:
No.
None of the Wakey or Cas players are good enough and if they were theyd be snapped up by now.
good point i dont see the need for any of there players anyway.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 11:36 am
by Webby1971
Could Brough fill 2 gaps 1. Scrum Half & 2. as I have posted earlier, goalkicker????? He's a good young player and would be even better playing alongside Barrett and behind our awesome pack. I think he would be a very good signing. Remember the Challenge Cup final last year he was outstanding and I was very surprised when Hull released him. Leualui has never impressed me either in Aus, for N.Z or with London, remember the last scrum half we signed from them.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 12:01 pm
by ChrisA
Cas best 5 players are, in my opinion:
Platt: very good young fullback, however we have no need at all for a fullback as we all know.
Brough: he's an ok player, would he go ok behind our pack next year and along side Barret? I think he would. He can cover hooker also. Plus he is a good goal kicker, and a very good tactical kicker. I would still much sooner see Orr partner Barret though.
Manu: such a strong runner, he would be good coming off the bench for any team as an impact player. We have no need though for back rowers, unles we offload some, Tickle is going, Hill seems average at best, and maybe Noble plans to move Fletcher up to prop next year?
Richard Faaoso: again a very strong running player with good ball skills. Thing is we just don't need any more back rowers.
Danny Ward: quality hard working prop who was always better at Leeds than Bailey was. Would be a steady player if we signed him.
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:14 pm
by MonoG
Manu would be a great utility player for next year he can play centre or second row and will cause problems for opponents as he has done this year if his wage demand isn't to high he'd be good for the team.
Last time Cas went down we got wagga so proof that players in a relegated team can be good enough.
Re: Should wigan sign any cas ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:21 pm
by Bear
Manu And Ward
Re: Should wigan sign any ...
Posted: Sun Sep 17, 2006 2:24 pm
by cpwigan
Do you not think Ward has looked poor. Big mistake rate. Seems to knock on a lot.