Page 2 of 5

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 3:48 pm
by jollygiant
you havent blown my first post as it will become true.gold coast have offered him mega bucks.

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:11 pm
by Cruncher
jollygiant posted:
you havent blown my first post as it will become true.gold coast have offered him mega bucks.
That doesn't make any difference. He's already signed for Wigan, so he'll only go to Gold Coast if Wigan decide he can. And I can only see that happening if the Richards going to Leeds in exchange for Bailey rumour, and the Hape to Wigan rumour, both turn out to be true. And there doesn't seem to be any movement on either of these yet.

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:30 pm
by jollygiant
my source is a very well known super league player who happens to be a good friend.not gonna mention any names.

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:35 pm
by Mike
Why would we want another winger, we've got two specialists and plently of cover on the wings? We need centres and props! Seems like a stupid move to me to swap a centre (who isn't really even a center) for a winger who clearly has some sort of psychological problems when his team's back is against the wall.

Even if Bailey did try to back out of his contract, we would surely want to swap him for one of GOld Coasts prop forward signings, or perhaps a different centre?

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 4:51 pm
by jollygiant
i didnt say that carney would be coming back to wigan,just that he would be coming home,but we would need a winger if richards is going to leeds,then still have money under the cap for a new forward if wigan release bailey from his contract.

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 5:23 pm
by jayde_hates_longy
:angry: Since when is richards going to leeds?

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Thu Nov 23, 2006 7:05 pm
by the-Bowtun-Warrior
not a prayer!!!

an aging injury prone carney? we dont want nor need him!

its centres we need (despite roumers he isn't a centre :conf: )

how many times have we heard that roumer? it isn't happening...(i sincerely hope)

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:57 am
by Bear
They havent even announced him on the website

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:03 am
by Matthew

Re: phil bailey

Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 11:07 am
by ancientnloyal
he still looks like a pornstar