Page 2 of 4
Re: Peacock
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 12:08 pm
by Cruncher
If you lot could just stop arguing over nothing for a minute ...
BH, are you now saying that this Peacock story is just another silly rumour, or is there more to it? How reliable is your source, for example? You were quite specific with dates etc, so does that mean you know more than you're telling?
Understand, we do get loads of tripe on here - people saying they know things but can't say what it is, people saying folk at the club have given them good info, but not naming the source or even revealing his/her position - and so few, if any, of these predictions actually come true.
If you can give us a little more than the usual vague stuff, we'll be more inclined to listen.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Tue Feb 06, 2007 8:08 pm
by Bendy Hendy
Cruncher posted:
If you lot could just stop arguing over nothing for a minute ...
BH, are you now saying that this Peacock story is just another silly rumour, or is there more to it? How reliable is your source, for example? You were quite specific with dates etc, so does that mean you know more than you're telling?
Understand, we do get loads of tripe on here - people saying they know things but can't say what it is, people saying folk at the club have given them good info, but not naming the source or even revealing his/her position - and so few, if any, of these predictions actually come true.
If you can give us a little more than the usual vague stuff, we'll be more inclined to listen.
I can asure you i would not post information if i did not belive it myself. Like I said, it came from a well known super league player, who comes from Wigan but plays for another club. He seemed to know the ins and outs of the deals in question, it was far to complicated for some one to have just made up. Also he has no reason to lie.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:24 pm
by thegimble
Peacock is injured at the moment.
If by chance DV is not in the side on Friday then there might be some mileage in what some are saying.
Though i think its all bull myself.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 3:28 pm
by Sutty
thegimble posted:
Peacock is injured at the moment.
If by chance DV is not in the side on Friday then there might be some mileage in what some are saying.
Though i think its all bull myself.
Personally I think it's more Rhino than Bull.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Wed Feb 07, 2007 4:29 pm
by shawcross da warrior
Re: Peacock
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:45 pm
by - psycho -
actually, i have ehard the exact same thing from a very reliable rugby league source. can only come 3 weeks in and vaealiki of to bully bully ive ehard. wondered why solomona was playign centre the other week.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:56 pm
by Mr Stu
i cant see peacock coming, if im wrong then i will hod my hands up and say i was wrong but why would bradford want vaelki off all players.
Re: Peacock
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 7:38 pm
by Ruzzle
He did indeed play against Hull, but started from the bench. Should we read anything into this just to keep the rumour warm!!
Re: Peacock
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:16 pm
by mike binder
- psycho - posted:
actually, i have ehard the exact same thing from a very reliable rugby league source. can only come 3 weeks in and vaealiki of to bully bully ive ehard. wondered why solomona was playign centre the other week.
come on we know Phychos gran gets nothing wrong i 4 one dont doubt her any more
Re: Peacock
Posted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 8:27 pm
by FROM A TO B
mike binder posted:
- psycho - posted:
actually, i have ehard the exact same thing from a very reliable rugby league source. can only come 3 weeks in and vaealiki of to bully bully ive ehard. wondered why solomona was playign centre the other week.
come on we know Phychos gran gets nothing wrong i 4 one dont doubt her any more
Nan, not Gran
