Page 11 of 11
Re: 2014 Kit
Posted: Wed Jan 08, 2014 4:12 pm
by josie andrews
I went into the shop yesterday. It's not the design really, it's not bad. It's, IMO, the size of the sponsors logo on the front!!
It will be the first time I won't have bought either shirt
Re: 2014 Kit
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 12:26 pm
by Aaron C. Rescue
Whelley Warrior wrote:The number of comments on the home shirt only proves how bad it is!
The shirt should always be the traditional Cherry and White Hoops with the only difference being the width of the hoop.
The present nonsense of these non traditional shirts is a reason why you are now seeing more supporters wearing sweat shirts, old shirts or anything which is more of traditional hoop design.
Why ?, few (if any) wear their 'traditional' shirts anymore.
Re: 2014 Kit
Posted: Thu Jan 09, 2014 1:05 pm
by josie andrews
Aaron C. Rescue wrote:Whelley Warrior wrote:The number of comments on the home shirt only proves how bad it is!
The shirt should always be the traditional Cherry and White Hoops with the only difference being the width of the hoop.
The present nonsense of these non traditional shirts is a reason why you are now seeing more supporters wearing sweat shirts, old shirts or anything which is more of traditional hoop design.
Why ?, few (if any) wear their 'traditional' shirts anymore.
I quite like some of the 'off beat' shirt designs, not all mind you. I like this one except for the dreadful logo on the front. It is far too big & the rubberised iron on sort of material is just awful.
There is only so much you can do with Cherry & White horizontal stripes. Last years was only marginally different than the previous years shirt, so I just bought the away one.
This year, sorry to say, I won't be buying either, both are equally as bad as each other due to the logo mainly