Page 12 of 12

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 4:49 pm
by Fraggle
DaveO posted:
Fraggle posted:
DaveO posted:

It should be ROTFLMAO
Sorry Dave, my bad. I've not been on Usenet for a few years now. Do I need to type out the letter T 100 times as punishment?

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT....
IMHO, no.

Dave
FWIW I don't think it would be a sensible way to spend my time either!

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 6:52 pm
by GeoffN
DaveO posted:
Fraggle posted:
DaveO posted:

It should be ROTFLMAO
Sorry Dave, my bad. I've not been on Usenet for a few years now. Do I need to type out the letter T 100 times as punishment?

TTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTT....

IMHO, no.

Dave
Please don't mention RFC's, DaveO, or we'll be here all week! :wink:

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 7:11 pm
by waterside glens
thanx any others do you know AFC

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 7:30 pm
by robjoenz
thegimble posted:
You miss my point seems some on here would rather win that game and we lose all others. Than the other way round. We all should look forward to it but the Giants game is about the most important of the season. If we lose then we might see CA or IM in next week. I do not think theyll change this week.
Perhaps Sedbergh was thinking we stand a greater chance of winning in the Cup than we do in SL. I'd probably be inclined to go with that.

What would your preference be... to get a roll on, finish third and lose in the semi for the GF and lose to Saints in the Cup.

OR

Win the Cup and finish 4th or 5th?

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 9:29 pm
by x Wigan Warrior x
Robjonez……….i think we have started something a little silly with our last few posts ! All these FSWG are anaesthetizing my brain (well what’s left of it). :lol1:

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 10:20 pm
by we need a stadium
Course were good enough, we just don't try!

The lads played 100% better at warrington and were stuffed by the ref. Far better than against Widnes, UTC Hudds and Bradford

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Tue May 17, 2005 11:45 pm
by Doveoverdave
we need a stadium posted:
Course were good enough, we just don't try!

The lads played 100% better at warrington and were stuffed by the ref. Far better than against Widnes, UTC Hudds and Bradford
.....and lost. :conf:

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 7:42 am
by waterside glens
doveoverdave the light at the end of the tunnel is a train coming :o

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 9:25 am
by we_need_a_coach
Doveoverdave posted:
we need a stadium posted:
Course were good enough, we just don't try!

The lads played 100% better at warrington and were stuffed by the ref. Far better than against Widnes, UTC Hudds and Bradford
.....and lost. :conf:
:angry:

Again !!!!!!!!!

:angry: :angry:

Re: NOT GOOD ENOUGH

Posted: Wed May 18, 2005 4:18 pm
by thegimble
robjoenz posted:
thegimble posted:
You miss my point seems some on here would rather win that game and we lose all others. Than the other way round. We all should look forward to it but the Giants game is about the most important of the season. If we lose then we might see CA or IM in next week. I do not think theyll change this week.
Perhaps Sedbergh was thinking we stand a greater chance of winning in the Cup than we do in SL. I'd probably be inclined to go with that.

What would your preference be... to get a roll on, finish third and lose in the semi for the GF and lose to Saints in the Cup.

OR

Win the Cup and finish 4th or 5th?
To be honest ill be surprised if we made it to the semi finals never mind win the CC. Pity we didnot play Saints last week as they were going to get beaten nevermid who they played.

Finishing 4 or 5 would not surprise me but fininshg 7-8 would not surprise me either. This is a weird old season.