WiganWarriorsFans.com

medlocke wrote:Great, we are stuck with this destructive force for the foreseeable future

I bet some opposition defences would have been glad to see the back of him as well.

Sutty wrote:

medlocke wrote:Great, we are stuck with this destructive force for the foreseeable future

I bet some opposition defences would have been glad to see the back of him as well.

i reckon a lot of opposing defences aren't as scared as some Wigan fans make them out to be

Hock is going nowhere despite what others say / read elsewhere. He could go to 2 SL clubs and be paid more than he receives at Wigan. Plenty NRL clubs would sign him if he was a free agent. IL wanted to see if he could entice big transfer fees from the NRL. He could not, nobody seems to be able to.

Sutty wrote:

medlocke wrote:Great, we are stuck with this destructive force for the foreseeable future

I bet some opposition defences would have been glad to see the back of him as well.

Very true IF he can avoid the stupidity seen yesterday. I am not sure he cope with coming off the bench. Far better to play him from the start IMO.

TWO EYED WARRIOR wrote:

cpwigan wrote:Hock is going nowhere despite what others say / read elsewhere. He could go to 2 SL clubs and be paid more than he receives at Wigan. Plenty NRL clubs would sign him if he was a free agent. IL wanted to see if he could entice big transfer fees from the NRL. He could not, nobody seems to be able to.

Is IL playing games with the NRL

Almost put your money where your mouth is ?

If he is you have ask, to what end?

As usual the fans know something has been going on but are clueless as to why. So we have speculation that ranges from Hock being a naughty boy so the club want rid, through him simply asking to be released and on to IL either wanting to sell for the money or being prepared to sell if the right offer came in.

It's going to be interesting to see what the final outcome is and what reasons are given wherever Hock is playing next season.

Nobody at Wigan can be stupid with Bitcon in charge. He is too good at what he does. However, if you cross IL then that can be risky no matter whether you are right or wrong.

medlocke wrote:

Panchitta Marra wrote:

medlocke wrote:Great, we are stuck with this disruptive force for the foreseeable future

Its good to see that you have clearly identified your next victim to persue Med's.
It was previously Lockers, but somehow he managed to keep you quiet regarding his weaknesses that you obviously thought he has/had.
I see Gaz Hock's rugby League skills far outweighing the negatives that you appear to be looking for in your next victim.
If Hock does stay, this would be by far the best news for me so far in this close season.

my next victim as you put it is a toss up between Mcilorum & Goulding, not decided yet, got the rest of the off season to make my decision :sly:

Will be interesting to see what negative comments you can muster on either of these two.

Panchitta Marra wrote:

medlocke wrote:

Panchitta Marra wrote: Its good to see that you have clearly identified your next victim to persue Med's.
It was previously Lockers, but somehow he managed to keep you quiet regarding his weaknesses that you obviously thought he has/had.
I see Gaz Hock's rugby League skills far outweighing the negatives that you appear to be looking for in your next victim.
If Hock does stay, this would be by far the best news for me so far in this close season.

my next victim as you put it is a toss up between Mcilorum & Goulding, not decided yet, got the rest of the off season to make my decision :sly:

Will be interesting to see what negative comments you can muster on either of these two.

non as i was taking the piss as stated in another post above :eusa4:

medlocke wrote:

Panchitta Marra wrote:

medlocke wrote: my next victim as you put it is a toss up between Mcilorum & Goulding, not decided yet, got the rest of the off season to make my decision :sly:

Will be interesting to see what negative comments you can muster on either of these two.

non as i was taking the piss as stated in another post above :eusa4:

Appoligies Med's, I didnt read the previous posts until after I had sent this one.
You have made a very fair comment about your thoughts on Lockers and Hock. Thats fair in my book mate.

Panchitta Marra wrote:

medlocke wrote:

Panchitta Marra wrote: Will be interesting to see what negative comments you can muster on either of these two.

non as i was taking the piss as stated in another post above :eusa4:

Appoligies Med's, I didnt read the previous posts until after I had sent this one.
You have made a very fair comment about your thoughts on Lockers and Hock. Thats fair in my book mate.

No probs marra