Sam T @ 6 for 2016?
Re: It's official, Sam Tomkins released from NZ Warriors contract
Sam and his advisor's are so clever. Cash in big NRL contract, return after 2 years knowing NRL contract / stock would be far less but SL will still then offer him silly money, possibly on more than 3 years. CLEVER.
If presume the deal was done some months ago (oh obviously the final signing not as well all remember the will he / won't he leave Wigan farce last time.
I presume IL / SW will throw plenty at Sam. The Doc could but will he? Wire could but will they? Leeds have offloaded 2 big contracts recently so they could and have the 'best' accountants in SL but will they?
If Sam was truly homesick it would be a no brainer but does any believe that horse poop
I still think we will throw enough money his way to do the deal and it is probably 99.9% done. I see Union as not interested leaving Wigan, Wire and Leeds with Salford outsiders.
If Sam did not come then I would snap up Hardaker is Leeds sign him or Ratchford if Wire sign him.
Whomever Sam signs for he needs a shave and tatoo removal!
If presume the deal was done some months ago (oh obviously the final signing not as well all remember the will he / won't he leave Wigan farce last time.
I presume IL / SW will throw plenty at Sam. The Doc could but will he? Wire could but will they? Leeds have offloaded 2 big contracts recently so they could and have the 'best' accountants in SL but will they?
If Sam was truly homesick it would be a no brainer but does any believe that horse poop

If Sam did not come then I would snap up Hardaker is Leeds sign him or Ratchford if Wire sign him.
Whomever Sam signs for he needs a shave and tatoo removal!
Re: It's official, Sam Tomkins released from NZ Warriors contract
CP
If i remember correctly NZW did not pay the transfer fee in 1 go its over the 3 years. Do you remember anything like that getting said by IL.
If i remember correctly NZW did not pay the transfer fee in 1 go its over the 3 years. Do you remember anything like that getting said by IL.
-
- Posts: 5038
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2005 7:07 pm
- Contact:
Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?
Moved from rumour mill to web warriors, as the return to the uk is no longer a rumour.
We all know we get first pick, just hope that we ensure the offer is good enough and accepted. Taking into consideration how the club treated him, that he's a Wigan lad and then he has Joel and Logan at the club I would expect us to be odds on favourites to sign.
I would also expect significant fan backlash should he be allowed to go elsewhere
We all know we get first pick, just hope that we ensure the offer is good enough and accepted. Taking into consideration how the club treated him, that he's a Wigan lad and then he has Joel and Logan at the club I would expect us to be odds on favourites to sign.
I would also expect significant fan backlash should he be allowed to go elsewhere
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
Warrior came
Warrior saw
Warrior conquered
-
- Posts: 6338
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 2:08 pm
Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?
Why would we not be able to afford Sam? If it is to be believed that he is currently earning $400k Australian Dollars down under that equates to circa £210k. We have Bowen and Burgess off contract plus several others, don't see why it would be an issue.FROM A TO B wrote:Moved from rumour mill to web warriors, as the return to the uk is no longer a rumour.
We all know we get first pick, just hope that we ensure the offer is good enough and accepted. Taking into consideration how the club treated him, that he's a Wigan lad and then he has Joel and Logan at the club I would expect us to be odds on favourites to sign.
I would also expect significant fan backlash should he be allowed to go elsewhere
Winning is down to 99% perspiration and 1% inspiration - Shaun Edwards
Sam Tomkins
Why has the thread disappeared? Am I missing something?
Re: Sam Tomkins
Try General and Rumour section.Wes wrote:Why has the thread disappeared? Am I missing something?
Re: Sam Tomkins
Power crazy moderation Wes
-
- Posts: 6134
- Joined: Tue Jan 09, 2007 10:24 pm
Re: Sam T @ 6 for 2016?
I think we will have competition, with Leeds to be honest SEFC, and it might be down to IL matching what Leeds are prepared to offer.shaunedwardsfanclub wrote:Why would we not be able to afford Sam? If it is to be believed that he is currently earning $400k Australian Dollars down under that equates to circa £210k. We have Bowen and Burgess off contract plus several others, don't see why it would be an issue.FROM A TO B wrote:Moved from rumour mill to web warriors, as the return to the uk is no longer a rumour.
We all know we get first pick, just hope that we ensure the offer is good enough and accepted. Taking into consideration how the club treated him, that he's a Wigan lad and then he has Joel and Logan at the club I would expect us to be odds on favourites to sign.
I would also expect significant fan backlash should he be allowed to go elsewhere
Leeds have offloaded Sinfield, Peackock and I think Hardaker is too much trouble for them to continue with so will see Sam as the ideal replacement.
I honestly think Leeds will go all hogg to get him.
-
- Posts: 38449
- Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 10:17 pm
- Location: Wigan
- Contact:
Re: Sam Tomkins
It's in the right place because Sam Tomkins is still contracted to the NZ warriors until the end of the season.cpwigan wrote:Power crazy moderation Wes
The forum it was in is for Wigan Warriors & until Sam re signs for Wigan anything about him belongs in the General Rugby League forum!
Thank you!!
Anyone can support a team when it is winning, that takes no courage.
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan
But to stand behind a team, to defend a team when it is down and really needs you,
that takes a lot of courage. #18thMan