Re: Hampshire
Posted: Wed Nov 11, 2015 8:56 pm
I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!
A site for fans of Wigan Warriors RLFC. News, views, statistics, profiles and more all contributed by supporters of Wigan RL.
https://www.wiganwarriorsfans.com/
Good call.in my view.Kittwazzer wrote:I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!
Just a minute. My position is basically the deal is exactly as it says on the tin. That nothing has been "brokered" or there are other ulterior motives behind it.butt monkey wrote:
As for DaveO. I know you cannot understand why Wigan brokered this deal. Please give your thoughts why YOU think we did this rather than simply pull apart other posters hypothesis and speculation
Exactly, as that contract has created the problem!Kittwazzer wrote:I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!
How exactly?Whelley Warrior wrote:Exactly, as that contract has created the problem!Kittwazzer wrote:I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!
Because unlike the short term two year contracts given to Finch and Green designed to fill the Stand Off position while a youngster developed in the Academy, a long term four year contract has been given to Smith which is preventing a natural Stand Off and good goal kicker from getting into the first team and more so, with the early return of Sam is also now preventing Hampshire even filling the Full Back position where Wane obviously intended to play him.Mike wrote:How exactly?Whelley Warrior wrote:Exactly, as that contract has created the problem!Kittwazzer wrote:I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!
Kittwazzer wrote:I will go out on a limb here and say that history will recall Rocky's 3 year deal being a far more astute bit of business than the 4 years we last gave to Smith!