Page 3 of 3
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 4:42 pm
by Wigan Watcher
Panchitta Marra posted:
medlocke posted:
i don't think we would have missed him though
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.
He also holds another record, he has given away more penalties than any other player in Super League. He's brilliant. :eh:
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 5:38 pm
by medlocke
Panchitta Marra posted:
medlocke posted:
i don't think we would have missed him though
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.
i recall a few months back, we lost a game (can't remember who against) Lockers got injured and never played in the big game we had the following week, we won and gave away away far fewer penaltys, we did not miss him then, i don't think we would miss him now
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:30 pm
by GeoffN
medlocke posted:
Panchitta Marra posted:
medlocke posted:
i don't think we would have missed him though
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.
i recall a few months back, we lost a game (can't remember who against) Lockers got injured and never played in the big game we had the following week, we won and gave away away far fewer penaltys, we did not miss him then, i don't think we would miss him now
Lockers hasn't missed a game all season.
That "memory" is just as spurious as the supposed penalty count against him.
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:52 pm
by jaws1
GeoffN posted:
medlocke posted:
Panchitta Marra posted:
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.
i recall a few months back, we lost a game (can't remember who against) Lockers got injured and never played in the big game we had the following week, we won and gave away away far fewer penaltys, we did not miss him then, i don't think we would miss him now
Lockers hasn't missed a game all season.
That "memory" is just as spurious as the supposed penalty count against him.
He went off injured early in the 1st Hull Kr game which we lost .
Does anyone know where the Stats are for players ie free kicks given against.
Seems funny how some fans latch onto a player they dont like which is their perogative
Panchitta Marra against Calderwood and Medlocke against O'loughlin .
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 7:55 pm
by butt monkey
jaws1 posted:
Seems funny how some fans latch onto a player they dont like which is their perogative
Panchitta Marra against Calderwood and Medlocke against O'loughlin .
Me and DV
Re: Lockers: no case to an...
Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2007 9:09 pm
by medlocke
GeoffN posted:
medlocke posted:
Panchitta Marra posted:
His work rate is top class, one of the highest tackle rates in Superleague this season, if not the top. His effort is second to none. YES I think we would miss him.
i recall a few months back, we lost a game (can't remember who against) Lockers got injured and never played in the big game we had the following week, we won and gave away away far fewer penaltys, we did not miss him then, i don't think we would miss him now
Lockers hasn't missed a game all season.
That "memory" is just as spurious as the supposed penalty count against him.
Like Jaws said, he went of early iagainst KR, i got mixed up Geoff sorry, but we still did not miss him and actually played better without him (or have i got mixed up with Hock)