Page 3 of 3
Re: If Feka is found guilt...
Posted: Thu Dec 27, 2007 6:51 pm
by GeoffN
seggie posted:
sorry i must have misunderstood the heading
Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill
That becomes more problematic when talking about legal matters.
There is a "sub jucice" rule (or "sub judicy, as DaveO calls it...) which means that upcoming trials are not supposed to be discussed in public, for fear of affecting the outcome.
That has certain implications for web site owners, amongst others, which is why such gossip has to be discouraged.
"In England and Wales, Australia and Canada it is generally considered inappropriate to publicly comment on cases sub judice and can even be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publically discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process."
Re: If Feka is found guilt...
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:23 am
by shawxshark
GeoffN posted:
seggie posted:
sorry i must have misunderstood the heading
Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill
That becomes more problematic when talking about legal matters.
There is a "sub jucice" rule (or "sub judicy, as DaveO calls it...) which means that upcoming trials are not supposed to be discussed in public, for fear of affecting the outcome.
That has certain implications for web site owners, amongst others, which is why such gossip has to be discouraged.
"In England and Wales, Australia and Canada it is generally considered inappropriate to publicly comment on cases sub judice and can even be an offence in itself, leading to contempt of court proceedings. This is particularly true in criminal cases, where publically discussing cases sub judice may constitute interference with due process."
well said geoffN
Re: If Feka is found guilt...
Posted: Fri Dec 28, 2007 10:37 am
by mike binder
feka as never denied hitting him ,the problem seemd to be why he hit him does your friend say some 1 else was getting beat up and feka stepped in to stop it ,no because people outside of the club dont wont to beleive that.
So until the courtcase is done i think this should now be blocked and anything else that mentions it should be deleted
