Richard Moore

Got a hot rumour from a source inside the club, or just something you heard down the pub? Then what are you waiting for, post it on The Rumour Mill.
User avatar
lucky 13
Posts: 2307
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 6:05 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by lucky 13 »

DaveO wrote:
warrior4ever25 wrote:lenegan will bring at least 1 winger back from the world cup
Who? Mark Calderwood? :lol: We can only sign one more overseas player so if he is bringing more than one winger back one of them will have to be English or rather English federation-trained.

Dave
Amos Roberts Sydney Roosters according to the Aus press is a target but we get linked to most players :blush: quite a good player wing ,fullback , centre in that order nippy good hands .
02/04/2010/
[IMG]http://i243.photobucket.com/albums/ff24 ... 10-1-1.jpg[/IMG]

HISTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!
ddtftf
Posts: 2175
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 2:07 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by ddtftf »

But but we only have 1 quota spot
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by cpwigan »

People can say this and that but losing Calderwood and Stanton just looks more and more like awful business. We knew what Calders could do and Stanton had the potential. For a saving of what ? a few thousand we now have to find a winger.
Sutty
Posts: 2336
Joined: Tue Jul 12, 2005 1:37 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by Sutty »

cpwigan wrote:People can say this and that but losing Calderwood and Stanton just looks more and more like awful business. We knew what Calders could do and Stanton had the potential. For a saving of what ? a few thousand we now have to find a winger.
For once, I agree entirely with what you are saying. I only hope that the club (coaching staff) offers Ainscough a proper chance to prove himself. He played in the pre season games last year and looked pretty good, then we saw nothing of him all year.


DaveO
Posts: 16034
Joined: Mon Sep 30, 2002 5:32 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by DaveO »

ddtftf wrote:But but we only have 1 quota spot


It may have just gone up to five.

This has been posted on rlfans:
The RFL wrote: Super League Clubs agree extension to exemption of club trained rules

After consultation with engage Super League clubs at this week's end of season meeting, the RFL board has approved an extension to a recent exemption to the club trained rules.

At the meeting held in Harrogate, engage Super League clubs unanimously agreed that the club trained rules should remain and that a number of players registered in the competition prior to the adoption of the club trained rules should count as federation trained players.

Clubs also agreed that any legal case brought against the RFL for introducing such rules should be defended vigorously.

Rod Findlay, the RFL's in-house lawyer said: "The club trained rules were introduced at the start of the year to increase the number of home produced players in the top flight. Clubs are fully behind these rules and reaffirmed their support this week.

"What this extension does is accommodate those players who have made a career in the game before they were aware of the possibility of club trained rules. Long term once the people qualify for the current exemption retire the club trained rules will do what they were designed to do and that is bring through more home grown talent."

To take advantage of the extension of the exemption a player must apply to the RFL to be 'federation trained' at the end of their current contract. They also must have registered with the RFL prior to 1 February 2008, the date when the club trained rules were introduced.

Their status as a federation trained will then apply throughout their career, even if they move clubs in the future.
I have not seen this mentioned on any of the news sites yet but it looks like a press release form the RFL. I normally get these as I am a mod on rlfans as well but I think the spam filter at work blocked it as I have not received a copy.

Anyway this will mean Feka, Bailey, Richards and TL will be considered federation trained for the rest of their careers. So in effect would could sign 5 overseas players for 2009 as their slots are freed up and we had one space left but not long term as new players (in contrast to those four) would never become federation trained. Phelps and Smith will not either as they arrived after Feb 1st 2008.

I personally hope we don't end up with yet more overseas players so we end up with 9 or 10 but with this rule relaxed it it would not surprise me if we did.


Dave
thomo
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:02 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by thomo »

Reviving an old thread here (and an old rumour)here but in the League Weekly their is an artilce once again linking Richard Moore with us - but my main focus on this was it mentions a possible warrior going the other way on loan which had me thinking who - Coley, Prescott, O'Carroll, Mossop or someone else - anyone got any whispers or ideas
cpwigan
Posts: 31247
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2005 11:03 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by cpwigan »

Not sure when we did so BUT we did offer Wakefield £80,000 for Moore.
thomo
Posts: 486
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 11:02 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by thomo »

If we have the money then lets spend it on transfer fees as we can't use our income on the salary cap.

Do we really want Moore- maybe as a backup possibly but he is not better than Coley and doesn't give the option of covering the second row like Coley does.

In my opinion Coley, Moore and Prescott are all what would be ranked as a 4th prop - we need another solid starting prop alongside Fielden, Feka as the impact off the bench and then one of the 4th props
User avatar
standishwarrior
Posts: 584
Joined: Mon May 14, 2007 7:56 pm

Re: Richard Moore

Post by standishwarrior »

cpwigan wrote:Not sure when we did so BUT we did offer Wakefield £80,000 for Moore.
we also offered either coley, mossop and o'carroll for moore

wakey chairman talking on the clubs website, go on rlfans topic all signings 2009 and its on page 25

medlocke
Posts: 10921
Joined: Wed Apr 12, 2006 11:57 am
Location: Millom
Contact:

Re: Richard Moore

Post by medlocke »

Nobby Out
Post Reply